Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Rumsfeld gone, Rice now target of war anger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 05:29 AM
Original message
With Rumsfeld gone, Rice now target of war anger


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/09/rice/index.html?section=cnn_topstories&eref=yahoo

With Rumsfeld gone, Rice now target of war anger

POSTED: 9:47 p.m. EST, February 9, 2007
Story Highlights
• With Rumsfeld gone, Rice becomes a focus of frustration over war
• Secretary is grilled and criticized by both sides of aisle in Congress
• Former secretaries of state, security advisers also criticize Rice

By Elise Labott
CNN Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Condoleezza Rice's appearance Wednesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was downright tame compared with the reception she got last month, when she sat before the same committee to explain President Bush's "way forward" in Iraq.

On January 11, the secretary of state got an earful from both sides of the aisle. Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, a Democrat who is running for president, called the Bush administration's Iraq policy "a fool's paradise," and Sen. Chuck Hagel, another possible White House hopeful, called Bush's plan "the most dangerous foreign policy blunder since Vietnam."

The tone this week was friendlier, but the criticism was much more pointed at Rice's diplomacy and her stewardship of the State Department. Committee Chairman Joe Biden, another Democratic contender for president, warned Rice that Iraq was sucking up the government's time, attention and resources and wondered aloud whether the secretary had the time to address the myriad other problems facing the United States. (Watch how Rice's star has dimmed Video)
.........

These are rough and uncharted waters for Rice, who sailed through the first six years of the Bush administration relatively unsullied as her colleagues -- particularly former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- took the heat for the quagmire in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. With Rumsfeld THOUGHT to be gone.
He's not gone. Just outta the limelight. MS press plays along. Rummy still has a desk and staff at the Pentagon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rumsfeld's not gone - he's "transitioning"
My anger is directed at the entire Bush adminsitration...even those who have resigned..and down to the lowliest go-fer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Rice's diplomacy"?
"The tone this week was friendlier, but the criticism was much more pointed at Rice's diplomacy and her stewardship of the State Department".

:wtf: Has Rice even TRIED diplomatic means to the myriad problems facing the U.S.? The Bush/Rice diplomatic corps: "do what we want or we'll bomb you back into the stone-age". Diplomacy at it's finest. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC