Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

did you know the dems gave Kucinich the cold shoulder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:57 AM
Original message
did you know the dems gave Kucinich the cold shoulder


he wanted to announce his backing for a Peace Department of the govt.

they gave him an out of the way room and no backing for the press meeting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. No I didn't
but I wish I was surprised by this information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Time to write a letter to Ms Peolsi as NO dem should be treated like that
when talking of a Peace dept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. He "announced" his support of a Peace Department during the '04 campaign
in the debates.

Is this something new or the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Same thing...more political self-agrandizement.
I'm not convinced that official space should be given for primary campaign grandstanding.

Unless there's an actual bill he's authoring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Democratic leadership always gives peace a cold shoulder
All the while talking about non-binding resolutions and deployment timetables and benchmarks. Plus their willingness to hang tough on bombing Iran.

Peace is not in the Democratic Leadership dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're not supposed to publicly say we want to promote peace
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 12:07 PM by Strawman
We're only supposed to use "muscular" rhetoric and announce we're "reporting for duty." Peace is for sissies. No so called "NASCAR dads" or "security moms" will vote for a pansy or flaky old hippie who says that. :sarcasm:

What a crock of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaggieSwanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. He scares most them
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 12:08 PM by MaggieSwanson
because certain Dems would rather NOT let people hear just how practical a Department of Peace would be. It's way easier to marginalize him when folks think it's just a pie-in-the-sky rainbows-and-unicorns type of proposal.

Dennis Kucinich has pragmatic ideas and a breed of courage that unnerves the status quo.

I'm not surprised by your report. Do you have a link so that I can read more about it?

Edited to correct a typo, and add a few quotes and a link.

"Citizens across the United States are now uniting in a great cause to establish a Department of Peace, seeking nothing less than the transformation of our society, to make nonviolence an organizing principle, to make war archaic through creating a paradigm shift in our culture for human development for economic and political justice and for violence control. Its work in violence control will be to support disarmament, treaties, peaceful coexistence and peaceful consensus building. Its focus on economic and political justice will examine and enhance resource distribution, human and economic rights and strengthen democratic values.

We must change the metaphor of our society from one of war to one of peace. The Department of Defense now requires in excess of $400 billion for its activities. A Department of Peace can be an effective counterbalance, redirecting our national energies towards nonviolent intervention, mediation, and conflict resolution on all matters of human security."

http://kucinich.us/issues/departmentpeace.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. this was read on c-span's Wash. Journal this a.m. don't know which paper

or maybe it was a verbal report by Roll Call or the other one the hosts of W.J. use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaggieSwanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks, I'll see if I can find it.
Media blackouts are hard to find links to! Thanks for reporting this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Peace takes courage. That's hard. War takes fear. That's easy.
The Democratic leadership is trying to do it the easy way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymark Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Media blackout
RW media is silencing the greatest peace advocate in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kucinich is the straightest shooter out of the bunch, - we don't want that though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Exactly. Might distract from fund-raising & selling out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Dem's all but ignored him in 2004 - The ONLY true liberal progressive running then & now!
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 01:56 PM by LaPera
Running for president, for those who don't know...Since the Dem's or the media never give Kucinich any respect or consideration...it's always the big bucks, sell your soul to the corporates moderate Democrats that they want to see run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. And yet, they'll give Ralph Nader the time of day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. In 1911 at the World Peace Foundation...
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 07:37 PM by happydreams
You never hear about these efforts; one speaker, Francis McCullagh, worried that there could be war in Europe, proposed establishing a medal of honor system for those who fight for peace. He railed against the glorification of war and said it will destroy civilization if we don't do something about it. He then went on and described this vast and profitable armaments industry so hungry for profits that they sell armaments to countries they know will be their enemy, and they even foment hostilities between nations then sell to both sides.

His is just one example.

I've been reading alot of hidden history lately.

Feingold & Kucinich in '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Fascinating, this time in our history was such a critical era and we made
so many mistakes that we are still paying for today. The Federal Reserve system, income taxes, the Trusts, the rigging of the stock market, League of Nations, etc.

Got any more nuggets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. The muckrakers
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 07:38 PM by happydreams
I used to wonder what happened to them. I now know they were systematically destroyed by the Morgan banking empire when Morgan bought into their publications then became their "editors". Also Taft, a Morgan puppet, attacked them by jacking up postal rates for magazines.

By the 1920's JP Morgan (now run by his son Jack) had a near hammerlock on the media--buying through proxies.
A veritable horror story.

Then House of Morgan pitched in to help Mussolini to power...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Federal Reserve was largely a creation
of Paul Warburg, a key financiall adviser of Woodrow Wilson. Warburg's brother Max was adviser to the German Kaiser. After WWI the two brothers got together again at Versaille.

Very strange stuff going on, very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. The DNC and the ruling elite have kpet him on the outside looking in
the whole time, he is one of their "progressive props" that they trot out to mollify us when needed and then put back in his box until needed again. I just hope that he can survive the primary process and bite them in the ass. He is the only candidate, so far, that is saying anything that makes any sense and has any chance of improving the sad situation we are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why am I not
surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. No, but it's no surprise.
The way his party patronizes and marginalizes him is reprehensible, in my opinion, and I like the party less for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. the congressional "democrats"
have allowed the neocon media to paint traditional mainstream Democratic values as "wacky."

So when someone actually speaks what most of us believe, it is so alien to the cogs in the DC machine that they can't handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. Was this before or after Kucinich decided women should have the right to choose?
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 01:02 AM by FredScuttle
Or maybe after his 2nd divorce?

Dennis Kucinich is the Pat Paulsen of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Two divorces and the ability to look at facts and change his mind, you're right
he should be forced to serve two terms for these heinous acts.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC