Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Timeline: A one-year deadline, nine months later

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:36 PM
Original message
Timeline: A one-year deadline, nine months later
April 5, 2006 Two Deadlines and an Exit

June 22, 2006 Kerry-Feingold amendment to withdraw US combat forces from Iraq by July 1, 2007 voted on in U.S. Senate

July 27, 2006 “Precipitous” Withdrawal Defined

August 3, 2006 Kerry: "Administration Sending U.S. Troops into Crossfire of Escalating Civil War"

October 1, 2006 FROM VIETNAM to IRAQ: State of Denial

November 6, 2006 There's something happening here

December 12, 2006 Bush reiterates opposition to 'precipitous' withdrawal from Iraq

December 16, 2006 Options Sought for Surge in U.S. Troops to Stabilize Iraq

January 17, 2007 3,026



KERRY: One year from now, troops -- look, the Iraq Study Group said, at the end of this year. I believe, at the end of this year or one year from today, when we pass it, you could require the Iraqis to assume the major responsibilities.

Now, if you're telling me that we can't transfer that within one year, I think most Americans would believe that that is the outside limit of what we ought to give them at this point.

The point is, Wolf, unless you leverage a certitude, the necessity for them to assume responsibility, they won't assume it. And they will use American troops as a cover for their continuing power struggle between each other.


JK: Well, it's hard to say. You know, there'll be a lot of people nervous about the issue of the funding. But I think, if you're opposed to the escalation, then you can't be content just to say “I'm opposed,” or to vote for a non-binding resolution. You've got to make an effort to try to say, “we don't want this bad policy to be implemented.” And you've got to think about those young men and women in uniform. I mean, they, they're the ones on the front line. They're the ones who are going to be put in harm's way. They're the ones who are going to go out there with some Iraqi soldiers of, you know, a dubious level of experience, and go out into the community. And I think they deserve to know that we're doing everything in our power to put the right policy in place for them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait another
six months for what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC