Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: House Debates Cutting Student Loan Rates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:38 AM
Original message
AP: House Debates Cutting Student Loan Rates
House Debates Cutting Student Loan Rates

By NANCY ZUCKERBROD
The Associated Press
Wednesday, January 17, 2007; 7:58 AM

WASHINGTON -- Continuing its march through an agenda of popular legislative initiatives,
the Democratic-led House is considering cutting interest rates on some college student
loans in half.

The House was scheduled to vote Wednesday on the measure, which would help an
estimated 5.5 million students who get need-based federal loans.

-snip-

To avoid increasing the deficit, the bill's cost would be offset by reducing the yield on
college loans the government guarantees to lenders and cutting the guaranteed return
banks get when students default. Banks also would have to pay more in fees.

The House was expected to approve the bill, though its future is uncertain beyond that.
The Bush administration and some top Republican lawmakers oppose it. Sen. Edward
Kennedy, D-Mass., head of the Senate's education committee, plans to pursue broader
education legislation that addresses the proposed interest rate cut.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/17/AR2007011700526.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wish they would also reduce the interest on
Parent Plus loans (9.5%). Us middle class families who sent more than one child to college are still paying off these loans. We also make too much money to claim the interest on our taxes. I don't mind paying our fair share, but at least let us take it as a tax deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hear you, we have two in now and had to do a parent plus this year.
next year we have one in and one getting started in the bush economy, we will not likely get the grant we got this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush never increased spending on Pell gants over the past 6 years.
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 12:21 PM by caligirl
""It was difficult Tuesday to find a higher education lobbyist who did not note with irony that this White House, working with the Republican-led Congress, had failed to increase spending on the Pell Grant, the primary aid program for low-income students, for the last five years, which is seemingly about to become six.

All of Tuesday’s maneuvering aside, the student loan legislation is expected to pass the House handily. The only real question is how many Republicans will join the unified Democrats in approving the bill."

— Doug Lederman

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/01/17/loans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does it still leave out grad students?
The version they were talking about a few days ago did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not sure, but I don't think they are still left ou based on bush's words here
"A comparable reaction greeted the White House’s announcement Tuesday that the Bush administration, too, would oppose the student loan legislation because it is misdirected to help college graduates (borrowers of subsidized loans don’t pay interest while they are in college) who have “higher lifetime earnings” who don’t need more aid as much as “students and their families who are struggling to meet current and future educational expenses.”

Instead of encouraging more borrowing by lowering interest rates, the White House said in its Statement of Administration Policy, “the Administration would support efforts to direct savings to additional grant support for low-income students.”

It was difficult Tuesday to find a higher education lobbyist who did not note with irony that this White House, working with the Republican-led Congress, had failed to increase spending on the Pell Grant, the primary aid program for low-income students, for the last five years, which is seemingly about to become six."

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/01/17/loans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm very intrested to know that
one month from taking my final exam for my PhD....the debt load is crushing and a major factor in my stress level. A little interest relief would be most welcome, especially when I become a poorly-paid post-doc and going for a faculty position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. as far as loans already taken out, a congressman from NY(dem) said
it won't effect those. that was Tim Bishop.It affects only those taken out this July and forward, it isn't permanent as to the interest rate, they plan to come back and make the interest rate permanent as funding becomes available in the new pay as you go congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I understand
It is the price I paid for taking myself out of the economy for the last 5 years. I'll take that half-measure for my future students and hope that we can get Congress back on the issue when the money is freed up.

I am one of those few young US academics that came from a poor background...the American dream is working for me..so far, but barely. I am grateful and will take whatever lumps come my way because I am one of the lucky ones...most in my old neighborhood are in the military or jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We do the FAFSA this month for our freshman student, our senior graduates
this quarter finally, so our financial aid will be a lot less, and with interest on a parent plus loan not affected by any of this we are once again left out, make to much to qualify and not enough to cover the cost. For those who used home equity loans they to got nailed on interest as well.

Lets face it, bush wants us rolled back to before 1900, we are stearage class in his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes, I have noticed
that the ground floor (the freshmen classes) are glutted now with well-to-do, upper-middle class students and many, many foreign nationals. I am seeing less representation from the lower economic classes of America, and that is upsetting (and a direct result of higher tuition and dwindling loans). I am quite certain that if conditions were like today when I was applying for college, I would not have been able to afford it. I probably still cannot afford it, but in for a penny, in for a pound.

I am also seeing far less men graduating, but that is another matter independent of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There is interest in why fewer males are going to college,
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 01:35 PM by caligirl
females with better stats for those schools wanting to raise their standing in the rankings? right now our school is in an ambitious building project, new library, new business school building and new building for the Jesuit priests(catholic school). The money raised for student aid was 1 million I think, but the money raised for the buildings was 100's of millions. Needless to say they are limited in the merit or need based aid. I have two sons so I can say I did help keep two men in school for my part. but at every school we looked at the lop sided male to female ratio was noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been watching all morning and I'm going to have to run out
to the store for another box of Kleenex. Those poor, poor Republicans. It's so sad. And they were so bipartisan over the past 12 years. Democrats are meanies.:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. have you ever seen such fraking "whine......asses?"
everything...they are going to "whine" about.....what a group of Rat SOBS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. they hope for the uninformed to take up their cause, they have no means
of getting the gavel, so they go for the throat in front of the camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC