Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a time limit on "speakers" at the House? I'm very new to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:01 PM
Original message
Is there a time limit on "speakers" at the House? I'm very new to
C-SPAN and am very turned off by the length and waste of time these speakers are taking? I'm not being obtuse here I hope, just curious. It seems like everytime I look up the same whiney repuke is still up there. It's muted, but still.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes, you cant filibuster the house
which is why it moves faster than the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. there are time limits set for overall debate on each bill and/or amendment.
Each side gets half of that time. Each side has someone who 'manages' the time (decides which members get how much) for their side (this varies from debate to debate it is not a set position). Thus it is common that the speaker will be given five minutes and when getting close to the end - ask whoever is managing for their side permission to use x more minutes. They are supposed to go back and forth - but often one side will keep yielding back and forth to their own. The problem for them when they hog it - is that the other side then gets a long block of uninterupted minutes because the first side used theirs up or most of the way up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow. Thank you salin. I'll continue with Randi..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. can't blame you - though there are times
when it is very interesting - even when time gets eaten up with amendments. Generally debate is slated for 60 minutes - maybe leave it on - muted you can then see when someone else gets up and can briefly listen to see what is being said. That said - I would bet that Randi would be more interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC