Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bayh Out, Warner Reconsidering?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:15 AM
Original message
Bayh Out, Warner Reconsidering?
Click here for more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kinda early for candidates to start to flip flop, isn't it?
But Warner is not Hillary, so if he wants to change his mind and run, go ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i don't know how seriously warner is reconsidering
seems like a longshot, but apparently there was some talk on the sunday talk show circuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish.
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 12:18 PM by nickshepDEM
He wont run though. I wouldnt be suprised if he landed on the ticket as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's one reason to reconisder
even a small play in the 08 race might give him a higher profile as a veep candidate.

because his excuse, that this would take time away from him being with his family, would be equally a problem if he were the VP candidate, right?

it's a tough call either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A Governor as a VP candidate I don't think so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. By all means,... let him reconsider,.....
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 12:33 PM by Parisle
--- I don't even consider it to be a "flip-flop,' really. And I sure as hell don't trust the recent flurry of media attention directed at Senators Clinton and Obama. Somebody is being set up, it would appear. The GOP has planned an opposition to Hillary for years,.. rightwingers have fantasized about a chance to oppose her in 2008. So, is a right-wing media attempting to "decoy" her into the nomination,... only to re-focus on her "baggage" once the nomination is hers? Or to create the mirage of a struggle between Clinton and Obama (for fun & profit)? Those are my fears. The media wants everything at the level of fake wrestling.

---And Obama is still sort of untested and inexperienced, eh? Remember the nature of the fight we're in,........ up against wildly efficient global corporatists, and our own home-grown nazis. I suspect the 2008 election will be among the bloodiest in US history, metaphorically speaking. We can't spend the whole goddamned campaign talking about Vince Foster and Travelgate,.. and we can't nominate on the basis of Obama's ample charisma, either.

---Warner's return to the race would be a welcome one. After all, he's been the best governor in the country in the state which practically houses the federal government. Wesley Clark is still my own personal favorite,... Gore's credentials certainly surpass those of Clinton or Obama. Edwards is back. Feingold and Kucinich are perhaps our two most prodigious thinkers.

---A nomination-election process revolving around Hillary or Obama will be either a big-money power politics deal or a trivializing media circus,.. as well as a socio-political experiment in either case. Can the democrats get serious, get over themselves... and make a truly shrewd and effective choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. good point
I've long thought that the GOP wanted to run against Hillary, so they keep touting her as the presumptive nominee, the heavy favorite, etc. I'm sure the GOP would love to run against Obama, too.

Meanwhile, Edwards leads in early Iowa polling, for what that's worth. And an Edwards/Warner ticket would not be high on the GOP list of things to run against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC