|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:12 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you think it is important that Democrats are united behind one Democratic Plan for Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. So far my answer to the question is winning big time...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Just goes to show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not! Getting behind one plan ( Patriotic Cooperation ) has made Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think there are some general principles Dems can agree on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Oh positively ,but one plan isn't necessary to realize the same goal.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
36. I don't know any Democrat that disagrees on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Though apparently not popular, I think its somewhat important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. I agree. Disorganization is a liability come election time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. d) impossible for democrats to unite behind one of anything. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
38. I disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monktonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. Also not popular.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I am of the opinion Democrats should endorse the ISG recommendations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Bush is going to stick it to the Democrats on the ISG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Because it's Getting behind something so important ,instead of Examining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. I though the President was suppose to come up with the plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. He's Ted Knight's grandson in 'Caddy Shack' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. The only plan that counts is the one that will bring all the troops home ASAP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. What does ASAP mean to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. As soon as it is logistically possible to do so... leaving all the equipment behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Well, that's not going to happen for at least two years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 11:41 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. We will be evacuating the Green Zone by chopper before the end of 2007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. VERY important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. I reject your premise. We ARE united behind one plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. What does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Let me spell it out for you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. O.K., then that would mean no permanent bases or other military presence. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
20. getting the policy right is what's important ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Unfortunately for the next two years it's the administration that needs to "get the policy right" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. well, yes ... and no ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. But Democrats are not going to agree on a specific policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:17 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. the ISG? no thanks ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. But you know who will be blamed for future failures, dontcha? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. It depends on the plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. I think once we have a nominee, it'd help for other Democrats in the public eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
30. not important.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
31. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
34. There is no one plan anyone can agree upon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
35. This is not possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC