Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for the GD:P Forum

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bukowski Fan Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:14 AM
Original message
Question for the GD:P Forum
Coelho brought this up on a panel on CSPAN this morning and I wanted to see what everyone's thoughts were.

Do you think if Pelosi is shown to be an ineffective leader in the 110th congress, that will significantly hurt Hillary's chances in the presidential election?

Personally, I don't feel that this will have a strong effect in the primary, with so many other factors such as war chest and organization playing a large role, but if she makes it into the general, I think Pelosi's performance will have a much larger impact. Has anyone been thinking about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. no . . . because Hillary HAS no chance in the presidential election . . .
she won't even get the nomination . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, Clinton has a chance, and yes, she might not win the nomination. As for Pelosi...
I don't really think so. I don't think people will link her and Clinton all that closely if only because Clinton's image is so defined at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodular Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can't really follow your post but...
Bukowski! Yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why should it
With all the republicans who stole money, were arrested for sexual perversion, bush still took the 2004 election. No body held his congress against HIM> why should they blame a candidate for the actions of the speaker. HILLARY WILL NOT WIN, BECAUSE THE MEN IN THIS COUNTRY ARE NOT GOING TO LET A WOMAN HOLD THE OFFICE. THEY ARE A BUNCH OF OLD BOY....MENTALITY....MAYBE IN THE FUTURE....BUT NOT YET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC