Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Rush built his radio empire.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:15 AM
Original message
How Rush built his radio empire.....
BAck in the 80's, back when there were still mom and pop radio stations, think WKRP, Rush and his supporters thought of a brilliant plan to nationalize what was a local radio show...

They discovered that a lot of these small stations were clamoring for programing in the afternoon...

The only problem was that it was becoming cost prohibitive to have talent on the air, especially during the least listened to part of the day...

The EIB put together a package that went something like this; we will give you our show for free if you agree to let us, meaning EIB, take say 5 of the 10 commercial breaks...

That way, the station could get an intern from the local broadcasting school to operate the board for minimum wage and still make money by selling those five ad parts...

This all coincided nicely with the elimination of the equal time policy by the FEC...

As soon as they attracted the tipping point of stations, say 150-200, they could go after some of the large national accounts...

FOr instance, Snappe was a big and early supporter of Rush...

It wasn't until the late 80's and early 90's that Rush started to appear in the large markets...

Then, Rush and his allies, pushed hard for deregulation of the airwaves and protected their product by dominating with a 20 million plus audience and hooking up with large conglomerates such as Clear Channel....

The only problem for Rush is that he is not attraction any new people to his show... In fact, he is not even dominating the air waves as literally hundreds of mini Rushes have flooded the market...

The good news is all of these "shows" as well as Faux News are competing for a dwindling audience... And Clear Channel is losing money on it's broadcasting division... A new day could very well be dawning for a truly balanced presentation of news and views...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds about right
At the time Rush went national, many AM stations were getting out of music formats. The rise of FM actually killed quite a few AM stations. Some even went off the air permanently, never to return.

For programming, they had to do something, and talk was really the only option left. Along comes Rush, offering his show on a barter basis (as you described) and voila! The rest is history.

And you're right about his show peaking. No way will it rise to the level of listeners it once had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. To this day, I won't buy any Snapple products because I still associate them with pimple-ass
And Lush should thank his lucky stars that Bill Clinton won in '92 or he wouldn't have had the central rallying figure for the far right wing whack-jobs and Pavlovian dogs his hatred appeals to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. If you enjoy
snapple beverages, drink them.

Rush Is also a Mac user, should people stop using Macs?

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. They should stop using Macs
If they want to actually do anything with their computers, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your post gives a very nice historical perspective......
Edited on Thu Dec-07-06 01:28 AM by CaliforniaPeggy
Lots of info concisely put.........

On edit: K&R...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. What pics are you speaking of? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Me thinks our new friend is hallacinating...
I'll be damned if I see her pics... http://eliteleague.co.uk/forum/images/smilies/duh!.gif
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Or hinting that he's web-stalking our fellow DUer? Vaguely THREATENING, no?
It's just a bizarre & CREEPY comment. I alerted on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I Alerted Too
Obvious man is getting on my last nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. .
Me three. I normally don't post about it, but this poster is so lame and mosquito annoying that I felt compelled. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. On Dec. 11th, Big Eddie moves to the SAME time slot as Limpballs across the U.S. and the reason.....
.... that Jones Radio Network is moving the program to Druggie's time slot, is because Big Eddie's ratings are so much HIGHER than Limpballs in Miami, NYC, Denver, Seattle, and a host of other cities.. (More and more all the time) ~~


Jones Radio Network is incredibly stoked about competing with the racist druggie!!!

Eddie took a lot of flak (initially) when the Jones Radio Network hired the same PR dude who made Limpballs famous, but hey... it evidently turned out to be a shrewd move? :shrug:

Congrats to Big Ed!! ~~~ ~~~


Since Druggie Loserballs is tape-delayed on Armed Forces Radio Network, they'll still =BOTH= be aired on the AFRN schedule. Good thing because Big Ed enjoys a huge amount of support from the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan ~~ :patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I, for one, believe liberal hosts/syndicators should enlist proven radio people
Edited on Thu Dec-07-06 12:54 AM by Fighting Irish
One of the main reasons AAR has had problems is that they didn't really go after proven radio people to help run it. And it doesn't matter if these people worked in conservative radio. In fact, I'd consider that a plus. The true successful radio people don't give a shit about politics. They just want to succeed. This is one reason I've been hoping for Randy Michaels (who owns Ed Schultz' show along with Schultz and Stu Crane, who was one of the people behind Rush Lowbrow) to buy them. Michaels has had a lot of success in radio, and even built up one of the most successful radio station owners in the country with Jacor back in the 90's before selling it to Clear Channel.

Imagine if AAR was bought by a radio guy who knows what the hell he's doing. I think that would scare the living shit out of the wingnuts. Even more than some well-heeled liberal who would just throw money at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Where can one even FIND radio ratings for different markets?
I keep trying to find how different shows do in different markets, but I never have any luck finding accurate numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Radio ratings...
I know that Arbitron and Neilson are both companies that collects that data..

Arbitron ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitron ) is a huge research corp. for radio, but they've had kind of a shady reputation for the imbalanced manner in which they've been collecting the data. Evidently, they're in the middle of changing their system.

Besides Arbitron and Neilson ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_Media_Research ) I'm not sure who collects radio listening trend data.. but maybe if Fighting Irish drops back in, they'll know?

Billboard Magazine has the ratings listed as soon as Arbitron or Neilson release them.. And you have to be careful reading the info off of blogs, because there's some real wacked out rightie blogs that often skew the info for progressive radio..

We have a LOT of DU'ers who are in radio.. so with any luck, they'll drop in later with much more info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. You can find overall numbers here
http://www.radioandrecords.com/radiomonitor/ratings/index.jsp

Be warned that these are just overall ratings (all people 12+). The good numbers are the ones that Arbitron sells to subscribers (stations, clients, etc). They include breakdowns by gender, age group, daypart, county and others, and are rarely published to the public. Therefore, many people, including the wingnuts, skew overall numbers to fit their purposes, when these numbers are really only about bragging rights.

Case in point are the all-sports stations. They often do terrible in overall ratings, but are highly sought after by advertisers wanting to specifically target the type of audience that listens to it (males). WFAN in New York is a good example. They're way down in the middle of the pack in the overall ratings, but they bring in more revenue than probably any other station in the country. They are huge in demographic breakdowns of male listeners.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like to believe you're right BUT
Rush's coverage over the huge middle part of the country is still virtually unchallenged and if they see any opening in the democratic agenda they will become a whole lot more popular because without the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE the rightwingers can say anything they so desire,and the funny thing is some people actually listen to that flatheaded moronic scumbag twit and hannity and all the rest. We need the Fairness Doctrine !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wingnuts are terrified b'cas Democrats (MAJORITY) plan to deal w/ Fairness Doctrine...
If you don't believe me, pull up any of the countless articles covering the topic.

Do a Google search using the keywords Fairness Doctrine Democrats under the LATEST news.

The SOB's are pissing in their Depends; freaking out that Limpballs, Prager, and the other idiots are on the way OUT.

Don't forget who controls both houses of Congress starting next month!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. I know, it's a beautiful thing. The MINORITY is this country has controlled the MSM noise machine.
Edited on Thu Dec-07-06 10:01 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
They have nothing left but to get lounder and shriller.

Time to wrest control and let the voices of the MAJORITY of Americans be heard! MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Even though unchallenged, he still is not increasing his
share of the market...

If he can't increase, the sponsors will start to look elsewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. it wasn't equal time
It was the Fairness Doctrine. Look it up. NOT equal time, not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I know, but most stations, back in the olden days, tried to
present both sides of an issue...

Those that did not want to even deal with the fairness doctrine did not present opinions...

In name, yes it was the Fairness Doctrine, but in reality, it was equal time...

So yes, I guess I was pretty close...

You, can look it up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. NO IT WASN'T EQUAL TIME - quit saying that.
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 01:40 PM by Morgana LaFey
and yes, I'm yelling. Equal time means 1 hour of this then 1 hour of that side. In practice, it could be 20 hours of this side and 1 MINUTE of that side.

Those stations that didn't present other sides of a controversial subject were required to grant some access to "responsible" parties or individuals who complained to present the side they felt had been short-shrifted.

That time could be as little as about a minute, aired (in the case of TV) at 5 or 6 am in the morning!

It was probably a bit better on most radio stations, but I'm not sure of that.

Nevertheless, it kept stations from being overly one-sided in their presentations, because they didn't want the hassle and they for sure didn't want challenges to their licenses if they didn't comply.

NOT EQUAL TIME, no where close. Stop thinking it, stop saying it.

And please, educate yourself, okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. There is no "EIB."
"Excellence in Broadcasting network" is just a phrase Rush Limbaugh uses on the air.

There isn't an actual company with that name.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I know that but it was better than saying a mess of guys around
Limbaugh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC