|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:06 PM Original message |
Why Pelosi? Why not Conyers for Speaker of the House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. You answered your own question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Why not as Speaker of the House though? Is there a legitimate reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. I love Conyers, too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. What makes you think Conyers is interested in being Speaker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. But do you have any objections to him being speaker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I'd have no objections if he were interested in running, but it's not up to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Alright, that's a satisfactory answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Why thank you - I'm so relieved that you approve of my response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Please let Conyers do his work with Judiciary. . .EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. It's just a question - do you think he'd be a good Speaker, or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Sure - he would be great at anything he wants to do. . .EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Let me put it this way, if Pelosi wasn't around, do you think Conyers would be next |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Maybe...maybe not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:39 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. No,he's never sought a leadership position in the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wow, tough crowd in here tonight. Not much love for Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. What are you talking about? The fact that no one here wants to jump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. It's just curious to see how defensive everyone is at even the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I would far better like Conyers as chair of Judiciary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Your assuption doesn;t follow. He's great - He wants Judiciary, I want him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. He's better as the committee chairman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Good points. I can agree with that assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. because i want to see him kick ass on committees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. we need him to chair the Judiciary Committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
27. Conyers would much rather be chairman of the judiciary committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC