Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Kerry is running away with it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:49 PM
Original message
How Kerry is running away with it
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4208279/

Kerry’s triumph is the work of several hands, from the young political veterans of the 2000 Al Gore campaign who are working in Kerry’s Capitol Hill townhouse headquarters to his base of donors from California to Massachusetts.

But four architects of Kerry’s victory deserve special mention.

First, and in an unexpected way, Howard Dean.

...

The second architect of Kerry’s victory was someone who isn't a nationally known figure: John Norris, Kerry’s formidable field marshal in Iowa, who helped keep Kerry in contention in the daunting weeks before Christmas when many pundits and pollsters were writing him off.

...

The third architect of victory was Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy, the party's elder statesman, who flew to Iowa to deliver rousing speeches calling on Iowa Democrats to support Kerry.

...

The fourth architect of victory was Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, who had designed a compressed primary schedule that concentrated contests in Arizona, Missouri and five other states on Feb. 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes.........McAuliff and his "compressed schedule" is responsible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Apparently the compressed schedule isn't good enough
What amazes me is that, even with the compressed schedule, McAuliffe is still trying to force people to drop out before even 20% of the delegates have been selected. I can understand his reasoning for a compressed primary schedule, but then shouldn't he at least let it play out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. he's just making suggestions
His concern is just raising enough money to beat Bush. That's all Terry is worried about because it's his major job requirement.

But he knows that the primaries will be over after March 2. Which still gives him enough time to reap in huge donations of Democrats who've been sitting on the fence, waiting for the nominee so they can pile on the $2,000 donations.

The process will play itself out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC