Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Deans decisions to opt out of the public financing system hurt him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:32 AM
Original message
Did Deans decisions to opt out of the public financing system hurt him?
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 09:40 AM by NNN0LHI
It allowed Kerry to to do the same thing without taking heat over it. And one thing is for sure. No one can compete with Kerry once he was able to use his personal wealth during the campaign. I can't believe Deans advisor's did not consider this possibility. Unless they thought if Kerry seen his numbers in single digits he would not have the nerve to spend his own money and he just might give up. I think that may have been the early fatal error the Dean camp made.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dean thought he was unbeatable.
They thought the money would keep pouring in and he would never lose. Besides that, it's a flimsy thing to attack on. The bad thing is that the lack of limits let Dean blow $40 million on 2 states. They wouldn't have spent as much if the limits were there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick for the midnight shift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely. Only helped if he was winning. Lost $20-40 mill in match
Kerry is also having trouble substituting for the matching funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, there are no public funds anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Care to elaborate? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Isn't Kucinich getting shafted out of public funds?
I think that is what the poster is referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't have a clue what the poster is talking about
That is why I was looking for a clarification.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Doubtful, Very Doubtful
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 09:48 AM by Crisco
Dean has raised over 3 million dollars - probably close to 4, since losing every primary/caucus except for DC's, which doesn't count.

How much do you think the campaign would be taking in if he'd won those races?

If he were winning, I'd have no doubt he'd be pulling in enough to see him through the period between the last primary-convention, where all fund-matchers have to stop raising/spending.

Even in not winning the races, he's still pulling in enough to keep him in the race against the Kerry juggernaut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. He'd have had 40 million to spend on Feb 3rd SC, Mo. etc....
And Kerry would have had to go it alone. I think Kerry would have opted out anyway because things were looking so grim in December.
As for Dean, it's of little consequence either way, for what good is money when people aren't buying your product?
Dean's optout was an early error but not THE fatal one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. It showed disrespect for the Public Finance laws he had vowed to support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC