Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is the best candidate for VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:25 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who is the best candidate for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other: Hillary Clinton.
Just think long and hard about this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I can't do that.
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 11:30 PM by eileen_d
My mind rejects that idea too quickly. I do not want the Clinton-bashing industry revived this century.

Assuming they don't beat Kerry, I like Clark and Edwards about equally for VP. I don't like Gephardt for it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't think the Republican machine
could react correctly to Clinton's candidacy. They would jump the gun, and the mudslinging would push the few undecided voters over to the Dem side.

She would also inspire some female voters to go the polls for the first time. I would put money on it if I had some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mose82 Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Good point
but I think she'll have to wait a few election cycles to prove herself as a leader and to take some of the wind out of the sails of the Limbaugh crew. Right now the Rebublican dirt machine is in full swing, even if poised for an inevitable decline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Welcome to DU, mose82
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 11:42 PM by eileen_d
:hi:

The thing about a Hillary VP is that it would completely throw the focus off the frontrunner. I don't like the fact that Hillary is demonized by a segment of the population, but I'm not going to ignore the fact that she is and that there literally is an industry ready to pounce on her entry into the race. So I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mose82 Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Beavis and Butthead reply
Huh huh..huh huh

he said "long and hard"

huh huh..huh huh

In all seriouness, that's what repugs would say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They would say "Hellary" (as they put it) or would
they make fun of my post with that Beavis and Butthead quip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't imagine any of these guys not in the top spot
Except that I can't imagine Gephardt in either spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. That Hamm guy, or LaRouche (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. voted other
Gephardt would be OK but whats needed is someone completely different.

I like Evan Bayh though people will singe me over it. Especially good for Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other
Russ Feingold (budget hawk, we need it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why
are there these endless polls on VP canidates? Especially since its unlikely that any of the candidates will be tapped for the VP slot. It doesn't happen that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because I like to keep the people who wonder why there are...
...so many polls occupied doing something. :-)

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buba Gar Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. MAX CLELAND
BRING IT ON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why do you limit the field to 2004 Presidential candidates?
I think that the V.P. should be selected from a different field, perhaps from an executive branch, since the final nominee - Kerry - is from the legislative one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I limited the field? Look at the last option once n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. The office of VP is the office of covert ops
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 12:18 AM by teryang
...and supervision of Pentagon and Pentagon contractor dirty tricks. You need an insider to run this. Kerry is qualified to do it but he needs to focus on the domestic agenda and undo the grievous harm that has been done to the Republic. Clark is the only candidate with the experience and skill to keep the intelligence and Pentagon back stabbers and intel dirty tricksters at bay. He can cover Kerry's back while he focuses on the national business.

Edwards would get eaten alive in that office. He just doesn't understand what a Frankenstein monster the national security community has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Have you let Edwards boyish looks fool you too?
I have to admit he catches me off guard once in a while too, but I know better. Edwards may look like a nice easy going fellow, but take my word he has killer instincts when it comes to politics. Don't underestimate him. He could still beat out Kerry before this is all over with.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He has no foreign policy experience
I like the guy, he's a trial lawyer. He knows the score in civilian society. When it comes to national security his views are simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No one knows everything. That is why every president has advisor's and such
I would trust Edwards to pick a group of fine National Security advisor's.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm not convinced that Edwards takes advice
...from anyone. He has the great drive and ego of a trial lawyer. Frankly, I would expect him to make a good president. In many respects I'd prefer him to Kerry, if he had Clark as his VP. As the defacto head of NSC, the VP cannot rely on his advisors, he must have the ability to formulate his own view of what the national security community is up to as well as the nature of intelligence estimates and advice provided to him. Edwards just doesn't have the background for this. One doesn't become a great trial lawyer and then become capable of controlling the national security establishment overnite. Each requires focus. I know several democratic southern trial lawyers some of whom are at the peak of their abilities and incomes, and they are very unsophisticated about national security machinations and their egos get in the way of any crash education course. Of course some great trial lawyers operate on the periphery of intelligence and national security policy matters. To my knowledge Edwards is not one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hope42mro Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Good Point...Problem is...
Clark is on record on Meet the Press saying he will never accept an offer for the Vice Presidency. :-( But I agree he'd be excellent. Especially because the VP does a lot of diplomac

He could change is mind later though. Screw Russert and his audio record! Clark is too valuable to be bullied by a clip that would surely be replayed on FOX constantly. The Dems need him, so I think he would suck up his pride and accept the VP.

But, anyway, I still want him as President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. That's the way it works in the Chimp administration...
Because Bush wanted Chenney on the ticket but also wanted him as head of foreign policy at the same time. In the next administration the secretary of defense will hopefully be secretary of defense and not deputy to the Vice President. Well that is unless Wes Clark is our VP, then I'd love for him to be a major player in foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Kerry!
Edwards/Kerry 04!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bernie Sanders
Just about the most UN-NAIVE person there is, and he knows where ALL the bodies are buried.

Can totally decimate the opposition in the nicest way.

Pull in the Greens and independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC