Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you believe CNN's "wuss factor" is real

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:47 PM
Original message
Do you believe CNN's "wuss factor" is real


UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE

in regards to reporting this administration?
in regards to its reporting on 911?
in regards to GOP talking points?
in regards to real world news?

I can't for the life of me believe this was a choice by the editorial minds at a news organization, running this poll.

Is this newsworthy? Is this fair or balanced? WTF is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Call them on their bullshit-here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. sent complaints to cnn
and alerted DNC, Media MAtters, Michael Moore etc etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just sent CNN a Nastygram.
Told them this poll was yet another reason to watch MSNBC. I told them they didn't have much credibility to lose, and that this propaganda poll took a big chunk out of what little was left.

GO KEITH O!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they all get a laugh at CNN at how many people respond to
these stupid questions. You know they're just doing it to prove they get eyeballs, don't you? Ignore the ridiculous questions. They're not serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I think it IS serious.
Our fearless Fourth Estate has been picking up Republican talking points and treating them as serious matters of debate for years now. (Remember how they reported on the horrors of Florida in 2000? Their "balance" meant that they treated a drive to accurately count all the votes and a drive to prevent an accurate count as morally equal in a democracy. Since when is refusing to count the votes accurately a moral position in a democracy? Since 2000 when the Repukes said so and the media went along.
This morning on MSNBC we were treated to a serious discussion of the "controversial" Nancy Pelosi. Will people be happy if the House is led by a "San Francisco Liberal?" This is right wing language, rendered particularly partisan by the fact (reported on MSNBC at the same time it's pushing the "controversial" label) that a whole lot of people in the country don't even know who the hell Nancy Pelosi IS! How can you be controversial if nobody know you? Never mind, if the Right Wing shapes the questions, the media hops in line. No amount of logic, no facts (and remember, the facts are biased) make any difference.
Kathy Crowley remarked earlier this week that "If the Democrats take back Congress it will be through no fault of their own."
I think a vast majority of these "reporters" are every bit as guilty of pulling this country into the swamp as the Republicans are.
Yes, I'm mad as hell, thanks for asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Showing your weak opponent mercy
It's a throwback from past elections. Maybe the public is now smart enough to hear the word 'wuss' and associate it with Republicans who can't win in Iraq.

The only problem with Democrats is that they are boring compared to Republicans, with all their bombs, guns, killings, scandals, psychopaths... just people who want to competently run government.

:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. In regards to the way some voters perceive Dems
Here is the article:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/24/crowley/index.html

It is part of the Broken Government series.

I don't agree that Dems are wusses , but that is played up by the Repukes. How else do you explain that a bunch of chickenhawks are considered patriotic while real war heroes like Murtha & Cleland are seen as soft. In the business environment perception is king. How people view you - the product - is often more important than the quality or substance of the product. The Repukes are very good at playing the Wuss card & this article goes into ways the Dems can overcome that. In many ways we are still fighting the culture wars of the sixties. A lot of Repukes believe that we would have won the Vietnam war is it wasn't for the anti-war movement and therefore anyone associated with that movement is considered a traitor. Of course the reality is that Vietnam was lost to begin with just like Iraq is now, but we are dealing with a bunch of folks who consider admitting mistakes a weakness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. How juvenile
what is this, junior high school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly. A poll question with the word 'wuss' in it being seriously debated.
From an unscientific poll called 'QuickVote' that's in a little rectangle on a website. CNN is loving it that people are writing letters of outrage. The CNN person who came up with the idea is all aglow and ready to ask for a salary increase because of the response he/she is generating. Would that all this energy could go into letters of outrage over oh, say, habeas corpus or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC