Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Edwards Apologizes to Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:48 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Edwards Apologizes to Clinton
October 20, 2006

Elizabeth Edwards Apologizes to Clinton

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:50 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Elizabeth Edwards, wife of White House hopeful John Edwards, apologized to Sen. Hillary Clinton after saying her choices in life have made her happier than the senator, a Clinton aide said Friday.

Clinton adviser Howard Wolfson said Elizabeth Edwards called the New York Democrat on Friday night just after she finished a debate in Rochester, N.Y., against Republican challenger John Spencer.

''Elizabeth Edwards called her and apologized,'' Wolfson said. ''They had a good conversation.''

Wolfson said the two spoke only for a couple of minutes.

''The senator thanked her for the call and wished her well on her book tour,'' Wolfson said.

more...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hilliary is a gracious, class act..........
UNLIKE MOST of the other members of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. This gives me a funny feeling
Something is missing here, I don'tknow what. Mrs. Edwards does not strike me as an intemperate speaker. Certainly, we are not in the heat of the 2008 election yet, so that cannot be the reason for this.

I suspect that the immediate apology has something to do with the way LHJ reported the thing. Which is odd, but I think that is what happened. Just a guess, mind you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Elizabeth said she was misquoted:
"Unfortunately, large portions of the material released by (Ladies' Home Journal) as quoted statements by me were erroneous and nearly all the statements, either because of significant omissions, or editing, or error, give a misimpression about what I said,'' Edwards said. ''This is particularly true with respect to my comments about Sen. Clinton, who holds a serious and demanding public office while I am largely home, joyfully I must admit, with two lovely children."

Edwards also said she has "great respect" for the senator.

Asked for specific examples of errors, a spokeswoman for Edwards' One America Committee said the magazine's transcript combined answers to two questions into one quote. Also, her comments about being joyous referred to previous experiences and were not meant to be a contemporary comparison, said the spokeswoman, Kim Rubey.

Later, Rubey said Edwards called Clinton "to explain that her words had been taken out of context and to express her regret for the misunderstanding."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. here is what I think
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 05:41 PM by benny05
1) Edwards was taken completely out of context on her comments. She saw the post later, and decided that she would communicate to Senator Clinton what she really meant; it illustrates consideration for a fellow Dem

2) The blog in particular mentioned on this thread, which is where this stemmed and picked up by the AP (guess it's good they are paying attention to us) may not necessarily support the Dems or Repukes and was trying to purposely pit Edwards against Clinton, since JRE is ahead of Clinton in the polls in Iowa...

3) We don't know the exact questions and exact answers to those questions either. This happened in Time magazine too, and from reading Edwards' book, Saving Graces, I could tell some of the answers to questions were taken out of context completely. So easy to do for print; in person, Edwards is able to tell her side with kindness, candor, etc, as we saw on Hardball, and on numerous radio interviews live.

My real question is this:

How do we not know that the telephone conversation between Edwards and Clinton was not leaked by one of the Clinton staffers, and yet her chief communications officer refused to answer calls?

Just a few thoughts, fellow DU'ers.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Very good thoughts.....
...about 8 threads on this topic on DU, many deleted messages later...yeah, we (DU) are better than this. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here's a good interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Elizabeth Edwards on Russert now. Not the least intemperate.
Give it a look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. LINK please? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. This topic has been beat to death in at least three other threads.
Stick a fork in it, it's done!

She apologized. Those who love her will continue to love her ... so be it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC