Why do the RW sites refuse to post about the deaths in Iraq?

[Erika]

They avoid the truth like the plague. Maybe because they rubber stamped W's actions on an innocent nation?

They need to check www.icasualties.org for the horrific facts on what their vote for W and the GOP produced. Enough with babying them. Let them look at what their votes produced.

[babylonsister]

1. We're fighting them over there, Erika! Come on! Amerika is

so much safer!

[Erika]

3. We brought terrorism to them. Our shame. n/t

[babylonsister]

4. Yes, our shame. All the people who yell 'fix it'; how to do that?

VOTE is my only option, because no one can fix what is broken now without a change in management now.

[EST]

2. If one is a winger, there have been no "deaths" in Iraq...

only collateral damage, insignificant to the invaders: important only to their immediate creche-mates.

[Erika]

5. Deaths of innocents are not collateral damage

when their leaders were not the enemy or even a threat.

There is another name for deaths to innocents.

[The_Casual_Observer]

6. They are embarrassed by all the deaths. They actually believed

that nobody would get killed but Iraqis & Arabs.

[Vexatious Ape]

7. Remember your fascist dogma:

Freedom isn't free. Get with the program Erika.

[tkmorris]

8. Because they HATE the troops.

And they hate America.

[Skittles]

9. because they don't give a DAMN about our troops

they care more about their stinking party than they do about our troops

[StClone]

10. Death doesn't become them

The U.S troop deaths aren't part (unless in extremely heroically fashion) of their war fantasy just the John Wayne part.

[Skittles]

11. ironic considering John Wayne never went to war

INDEED; he was never a soldier OR a cowboy

[StClone]

12. Exactly

Talk the walk and let your imagination take a ride...live the dream. Reagan was into it too.

[AlCzervik]

13. because the fallen don't make for good photo-ops?