Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ned Lamont's Concession Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:49 PM
Original message
Ned Lamont's Concession Speech
I stand before you tonight with a very heavy heart. Not because I lost, but because of the way I lost. And because I realize that I didn't have to.

First and foremost, I want to apologize to all of you who gave your heart and soul -- and your hopes for a better America -- to this campaign. Instead of honoring that commitment, I ran a milquetoast race, and I am deeply sorry. You wanted reform, and I gave you warmed-over political platitudes. You wanted righteous indignation, and I gave you calculated criticism.

Like Al Gore and John Kerry before me, I forgot how high the stakes were. And I played it safe. I played not to lose rather than to change the country. I forgot that I had to give people a reason to vote for me -- or a reason to vote against my opponent -- every single day, every single hour. I forgot --and how could I forget? -- how dirty the other side would play to win. I forgot that in building a successful business of my own, I had relied on my own gut instincts, not on advice from some M.B.A. textbook. I should have stuck with my gut; instead I let consultants tell me what to do and what to say.

snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/ned-lamonts-concession-s_b_31821.html

Between now and election day Dem candidates and campaign managers everywhere should read this every day as soon as they wake up ... if they did maybe they'd stay awake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Joe Lieberman didn't win this election; I lost it."
Edited on Mon Oct-16-06 05:53 PM by MrCoffee
Exactly like Chimpy. Exactly.

I love being kicked in the teeth over and over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. how do I hide a thread again?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No need to hide it - bookmark it and TROUNCE it when Ned wins!!!
:fist_in_the_air:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Not to worry....
Playing by Fight Club Rules :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. For Lamont to win, Republicans have to go back to Schlesinger
When Lieberman became, in effect, the Republican candidate, that's enough to put him over the top if you figure that he splits the independent vote and still holds about 1/3 of Democrats.

We should be helping out Schlesinger in the same way a lot of conservatives lent a helping hand to Nader in 2000 and 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. After his *ahem* spirited performance in the debate today
I should think some Repukes will go back to Schlesinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Being re-aired on Cspan 11pm ET
He did just fine :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thats why the DEMS need to vote for the DEM
and not the canidate from the Joe Lieberman party. If Ned Loses, it's the Dems fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you say Joe Sec. Defence Nov 14th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't buy that theory. There is no evidence that Joe Lieberman...
...wants to be Defense Secretary.

Why would he choose two years as Defense Secretary over another 6, 12, 18, 24 or more years as Senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. He was actually interested earlier in Bush's 2nd term. Now, not so much.
Don't know whether he would've taken it if it had been offered. It's just useless what-ifs now. But I read a couple of places that he was asking surreptitiously whether Rumsfeld might actually be on the way out. Lieberman isn't exactly pro-Bush; he's got his own agenda in all these shenanigans and supporting Bush happens to dovetail with that agenda. But he isn't exactly Einstein, either, in thinking that he could do as SecDef what he wants to see done while working under a President Bush. Despite all his cynicism and electoral craftiness, Lieberman I think is a surprisingly naive man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. What the hell is this - did Lamont really say this
If he did - I'm really pissed at him. Because we have two weeks until the election, now is not the time to give up. And more importantly - much good CAN come out of Ned Lamont. Sure, perhaps we might lose the seat to Lieberman; however, we have THREE very highly competitive congressional districts in Connecticut that could switch from republican representative to democratic if we have a good voter turnout in Connecticut.

And if Ned Lamont is conceding two weeks before the election than personally he can go fuck himself because this could discourage voters and possible keep some, if not all of those seats controlled by republicans.

Perhaps because I'm an Eagles fan or maybe because I've been a democrat for too long, but just because we're behind doesn't mean we should just give up the fight.

Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong. But if Lamont is just giving up like this I'm really going to be pissed. He's potentially screwing up a chance for 3 more congressional seats and that just pisses me off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Click. On. The. Link. In. The. OP.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Hey, I'm in Canada this week so sue me
I don't know what's gonna happen with the Lamont race, but I'm really hoping he inspires a bigger voter turnout that'll turn those three republican congresional seats into democrats ESPECIALLY since they are in predominantly democratic voter districts. If Lamont loses but we can turn some of those house seats at least the work that Lamont did would not have gone to waste!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. dem on this board priceless... now giving concession speech 3 weeks
out ....

pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The last part of the article title was conveniently left out
"...A Speech I Never Want to Hear"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. how'd this crap get 5 votes? jeez give me a damn break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well I didn't vote for it
I knew the article was crap as soon as I clicked on the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. How can C-Span put a 'D' after Lieberdweeb's name??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC