Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Little FAUX Advice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:50 PM
Original message
A Little FAUX Advice
A Little FAUX Advice
By Nancy Greggs

Sent to: FOX-TV, News Division, October 10, 2006

Dear Sirs:

I understand that your network has been having some difficulty of late in properly identifying the party affiliation of several politicians who are currently prominent in the news.

In the past week, you have mistakenly identified disgraced Congressman Mark Foley (R) as a Democrat, and in a graphic showing the current poll numbers in Rhode Island, you mis-identified Mr. Chafee (at 39%) as the Democrat, and Mr. Whitehouse (at 50%) as the Republican. In fact, as you know, their party membership is the other way around.

I realize this might be an overwhelming task for your research department, so I thought I’d give you a few tips on how to keep your (D)s and (R)s straight.

At this point, just weeks before elections take place, if you are displaying graphics that show current poll numbers as between candidates in any given race, you can safely assume that in all probability, it is the Democrat (D) who has the higher number.

The same probability applies to surveys. Let’s say the survey asked respondents: “Which party do you think is better on issues of national security?” Chances are the LARGER number of people chose Democrats (D) over Republicans (R). This simple rule-of-thumb applies to questions about which party would better handle the economy, the War in Iraq, the deficit, education, healthcare, prescription drugs, social security, environmental protection, fair taxation, transparent elections, upholding the Constitution – well, I think you get the idea.

By the same token, it is fairly easy these days to know where the (R) is more than likely appropriate. For example, if you are covering a story that involves a cover-up to protect child molesters, manipulation of voting machines, voter suppression, bribe-taking, stock fraud, tax evasion, shady real estate transactions, etc., these kinds of activities will, in all likelihood, involve a Republican, e.g. Frist (R), Foley (R), Hastert (R), Allen (R), Cunningham (R), Corker (R), Santorum (R), and so on.

Certain news coverage will ALWAYS require the use of an (R), such as any news item relating to payoffs from Jack Abramoff, the appointing of incompetent Administration cronies to important positions, or war profiteers being handed no-bid/no-questions-asked government contracts.

Word association is also a useful tool in keeping political identification as accurate as possible. Just remember that a DEMocrat is for DEMocracy and DEMonstrating leadership, while a REPublican is for the REPression of freedom and REPrehensible behavior. Isn’t THAT a clever and easy way to recall where the (D)s and (R)s belong?!

Also keep in mind that it is the Republicans who have been in control of the country for the past six years, which means that ALL of the country’s current problems should be displayed with the appropriate letter: the debacle in Iraq and Afghanistan (R), the foundering economy (R), the growing deficit (R), the sanctioning of torture (R), the outsourcing of jobs (R), the deterioration of the infrastructure (R), the failing education system (R), and increases in joblessness (R), homelessness (R), citizens living in poverty (R), Americans without health insurance (R), violent crime (R), personal bankruptcy (R) and home foreclosures (R) – to name but a few.

I hope these handy guidelines will assist you in keeping your coverage accurate, as well as ‘fair and balanced’.

I am sure you realize what a negative reaction your viewers might have if they see a disgraced, forced-to-resign-immediately Republican misrepresented as a Democrat. They might get the idea that you are deliberately trying to mislead them; they might even start wondering about the truthfulness of your coverage overall.

Therefore, I am confident you will want to do everything in your power to avoid that unhappy outcome, especially in view of your currently falling ratings and diminishing audience share.

Yours Truly,
Nancy Greggs

P.S. Just a word to the wise: You might think about getting your (D) graphics ready for election night coverage; you’re going to be using them a lot.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I giggled all the way through that! Another great job, Nance! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wise words, Nance
They should hire you as a consultant.

You can be the one sitting in the corner saying, "WRONG... try again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. K& R
Excellent job!

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe its a software issue...
Enhanced Diebold™ scandal & popularity tracking software™


its just been screwing up with all the turnovers of polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fantastic as always!
Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Smooth as KY jelly.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Damn, that was flawless! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. You Rule, Nance!
Again. Your commentaries have been awesome lately.

Thanks so much for being here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's so nice that you are such a consistently good and prolific writer
I love getting to read your stuff on a regular basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. They report. You decide.
Thanks for deciding to hand them their sorry asses!

:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent, Nance!
Love your writing, love your sense of humor.

Here's a hug. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nance, that's great.
In a parallel universe where I'm brilliant, I wrote that instead of you.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. InternalDialogue, if you're involved with Two Guys Productions
You ARE brilliant.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldboy101 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. I would love to see Keith Olbermann read this on the air!
It is just the sort of thing that he loves to do to Faux News. Your letter certainly deserves to be widely circulated, Nancy. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
53. ?????
has anyone sent this to keith olbermann? i would love to hear him read it on the air! that would ROCK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Your are so freggin AWESOME!
I always enjoy you writing! You say it like it is...Damn you are good!

:toast:

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. Love it, love it, love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. They distort, we deride.
Where do I sign up for the NanceGreggs fan club?

Newsprism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. LMAO...
I love this! I'm going to forward it all over the place... just perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nance, you ROCK! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Now THAt is a beautiful thing!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. I sure hope that you actually sent it to Faux News!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEconomist Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. You omitted something important...
REP is also found in REPtilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sanguinivorous Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Please...
...don't insult reptiles by comparing them to these sleazebags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Brava! Brava!
If I had a glass I'd raise it to you. But for now we'll have to settle for a water bottle from my wife's chiropractor. Either way: Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Awesome
Love it! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Well, if that doesn't straighten them out, they're just
hopeless. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. We'll go with the curtain number two, Monty.
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 05:09 PM by swimmernsecretsea
Hopeless? Clueless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. That is hysterical... and true!
Wonderful writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUBYASCREWEDUS Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. BRAVO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. You rock, Nance Greggs!
Did you really send that? It was fantastic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I sent it yesterday afternoon ...
... before I posted it here.

Damndest thing - they still haven't responded ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. They won't respond
You want a response? Tell them you have proof Hillary Clinton is a lesbian and supports terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Oh, SNAP!
That is a thing of beauty! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. Fan-Freakin'-Tastic!!
That was beautiful, Nance!! Perfectly written!!

They need to be spanked and you, my dear, spanked them with style! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Love that P.S., Nance !!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. They're getting so freaked out over there ...
... I keep wondering if they're going to slap (R)s next to all of the winners' names -- and just keep gabbing for the next two years about how the GOP is still in control. Added bonus: When the Dems start turning things around, they can give all the credit to their own.

Let's face it, their core audience won't ever be the wiser anyway ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astonamous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
37. Wow, I just sent the link to this post to a number of people and
got a reply back from one that said it was soooooo full of holes that it was pathetic. I replied back that if there were any holes it was in the people's heads that believe anything reported on Faux News and that those holes are always plugged up with blame for everything going to Clinton.

Trudy
www.richardpryor.com
www.pryorsplanet.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Now I am DYING of curiosity ...
... exactly what are 'the holes'? Ask your friend, and get back to us with the response!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astonamous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. I did ask...
and haven't heard back yet. Probably won't. I am ready to back up everything on you letter to Faux other than the outcome of the future election results. But you can believe when that comes true, I'm going to be sending the "nanny-nanny-boo-boo" email that says I told you so. :headbang:

Trudy
www.richardpryor.com
www.pryorsplanet.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. Good one! k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. Word of warning to anyone reading a Nance Greggs thread.
Do NOT, under ANY circumstances, be eating an Oreo cookie while reading said threads.
You will be sorry.

(Anyone know how to get cookie out of your nose?) ;)

Nance, I've give my first born (if I had one) to be able to write like you.

Another BRAVO post! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. What ^they^ said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
42. Great letter!!! Can't wait to hear the reply.....NOT!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
43. Witty!
Biting and very well written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
44. wonderful article!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. Sadly, too late to recommend, but can still give it a kick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. "getting your (D) graphics ready for election night coverage"
"you're going to be using them a lot."

LOVE IT!

Great rant!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. That is so awesome!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
49. Bush administration, Rated R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
50. Perfect, simply perfect!
I had fun giggling thru it all.

So easy, yet SO TRUE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
51. You absolutely humiliated them with your perfect balance of
sarcasm, humor and condemnation.

Good for you! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
52. This needs to be as widely circulated
on the Internet as is all those 'for-shit' Repuke emails that turn up on a regular basis.

Also, this should be sent to the editorinal departments of all major newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC