|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:03 PM Original message |
Does anyone have the details on Gary Studds? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. All I know is that whatever happened, happend 24 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agree 100 percent. I'm just trying to find out what happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. actually more like 33 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Whoa.. I just saw '83' this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. 83 was when he was censured - 73 was the affair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwentyFive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Studds committed no crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Do you have any links to that info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. From the Wikipedia article mentioned in post #5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadow 99 (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. and the citizens of MA re-elected him (studds) until he retired NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Thanks for posting that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwentyFive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Oops, my error. Thanks for the corrected info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Isn't his first name Gerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsr1771 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Studds did same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I am a partisan, but I'm not defending anyone here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. He managed to "keep his job" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsr1771 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. So if Foley... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Why waste your time condemning a 33 year old affair? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsr1771 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. was he a predator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Was Daniel Crane? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsr1771 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 06:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. isn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. No, one page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwentyFive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. It was 1973. Laws and attitudes were way different back then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 07:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. This is about scumbag repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. He had some sort of relationship with a page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC