Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Path to 9/11": A Chinese connection?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cannonfire Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:41 AM
Original message
"The Path to 9/11": A Chinese connection?
I think I've found the reason why Disney has made the otherwise unfathomable decision to air a miniseries without ads.

Disney desperately wants to expand into China, but the company is having problems with the Chinese government. The rulers of China have placed severe restrictions on the importation of animated films, which have a greater cross-cultural appeal than do live-action American films. The stated reason for the restrictions has something to do with "cultural contamination"; the real reason is protection of China's growing domestic animation industry.

Disney also hopes to build a theme park in China. Iger has spoken about this goal in public. Unfortunately, the governmental red tape presents a formidable obstacle.

Only the Bush administration can bring pressure on the notoriously difficult Chinese government. Disney needs Bush's help. Billions could be at stake.

This, I believe, is the real reason why Disney is going to such outlandish lengths to help the Republicans in the run-up to the election. The $30 million production cost of the miniseries may be small compared to the potential profits in China.

I've written about this on my blog, Cannonfire. I also discuss the idea of appealing to Disney's chief stockholders -- the group which forced the ouster of Michael Eisner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting theory....
and a very plausible one imo.

Welcome to DU!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Disney is already building a theme park in Beijing and
has opened one in Hong-Kong as well. Was reading a funny story about how tours in Hong Kong were more likely to visit transvestite shows than Disney Hong Kong because the Disney people didn't realize you had to "tip" the tour people to get their business.

I can go to any major city in China now and buy a compressed DVD that has every Disney animated movie on it. The actual movie business in China is peanuts, as pirated movies are so easily available that there is no incentive to go out to the theater if you can watch it at home on your home theater system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cannonfire Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good points, but...
...cracking down on piracy is another massive reason why Disney would want the Chinese government to be cooperative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why is Disney gambling on Bush and the GOP? They're history.
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 08:13 AM by leveymg
The Chinese angle may, indeed, be a factor, but I don't believe it's the main one.

Tell me if I'm wrong. Disney already offshores much of its animation to Chinese contractors. That started with Mulan (a wonderful film). That gives Disney a lot of sway with Beijing. A Disney theme park in China is a near billion dollar investment over half a decade. By the time it opens, BushCo will be long gone (one hopes).

So, why appease BushCo for a project in China. Maybe, the present management at Disney has a host of reasons to want to create GOP-pleasing fantasies? It seems all the major networks and entertainment conglomerates have turned hard-right in recent years.

I'd be concerned as a stockholder. This may not be a very good business decision, as American politics are shifting the other way.

Welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC