Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't buy this Armitage crap for a second

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:00 PM
Original message
I don't buy this Armitage crap for a second
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 12:01 PM by nam78_two
not one second...

complete BS :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Me either. Check his bank accounts. I smell a rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I am pretty damn sure POWELL was not part of the conspiracy, because
he knows better.

As for Armitage, here is why I think that he had a peripheral role.

Armitage came forward almost immediately and ID'd himself as the/a source for Novak. He claims that he did not know that Valerie Plame was undercover CIA. He only knew that she worked on the topic of weapons of mass destruction. Therefore he had broken no laws. If he was lying about this, I think that Fitz would have caught him. Fitz is damn thorough, and as a cooperating witness, Armitage would have had to answer all his questions, no taking the 5th.

Now, suppose Armitage was part of a conspiracy involving Cheney, Rove, Scooter (and maybe even Powell his boss), and it all went bad. If Armitage really did not know about Plame's CIA status, he would have been an obvious candidate to take the fall, since there would have been no way to press criminal charges against him. You have to be able to prove that the person in the gov't knew that the CIA agent outed was an undercover spy. All he would have been guilty of was gossiping about some stuff he heard about. He was going to leave the White House anyway with Powell, so it would not have been any big deal. Since he came forward voluntarily and cooperated there was no risk of any obstruction of justice charge against him. It would all have been a big "oops".

But Armitage did not take a fall for Cheney and the others. It looks like he may have cooperated in helping Fitz go after the others. This is the only way that a man in his situation could prove that his loose lips were innocent.

What I smell is a conspiracy cooked up by Dick Cheney who has modelled his White House on that of Dick Nixon. Armitage was either persuaded to tell Novak about Valeri Plame's WMD work or read Cheney's memo and gossiped about it, but he did not know about her undercover CIA status. When he realized that a crime had been committed, he rushed to cooperate with law enforcement was as happy as a clam to turn in the real criminals at the White House, Cheney, Rove and Libby.

It is no wonder that Cheney, Rove and Libby instructed Bob Novak to "out" Armitage last weekend. It is no coincidenc that right wingers like Nora O'Donnel keep talking about Armitage, asking if his involement means that Scooter is now off the hook and Powell is now in trouble. It is a bit surprising to see this kind of Karl Rove inspires craziness here at DU.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's bullshit. Too many liars and traitors are gonna get off
the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yup
as per usual :(.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Me either
Three years later they dig this up? Comeon

And the law states that the person must knowingly tell someone an agent was undercover so they find someone for whom it was just a mistake, that had no idea? And right before an election too, what a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Huh? So you buy the Pin the Blame on Powell story that Rove is selling?
Why would Novak suddenly want to out ONE of his sources, Armitage? Think about it? It is because Armitage is POwell's man, and the new strategy is to claim that Colin Powell and Richard Armitage were the real leakers, not Cheney-Scooter-Rove. However, this is utter bs. Armitage has been cooperating with Fitz from day one. He got his info from a document that Cheney drew up about Plame and started circulating around the White House. In other words, Armitage is just a middle man in the Cheney sponsored leak. Armitage did not know that PLame was undercover CIA when he talked about her, the way that Cheney, Scooter and Rove did, so he broke no laws. It would have been very convenient for the WH had he chosen to take the fall for Cheney, but he did not--because he was not the one who started the conspiracy to out her.

I can not believe that people are still trying to blame Powell and Armitage for the Plame Affair at DU. We have gone over this so many times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I just don't buy the-"it was harmless gossip" crap /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. What Part of "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" Eludes the Mind?
They're all in it together, and if there is a God, they will all go down together, pissing on themselves and their co-conspirators, as they have been doing for months now.

I'm waiting for the big ones: Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and the Supremes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Me neither. It is Rosemary Woods and the 18 1/2 minute gap all over
again. The difference is that this time I think it is working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, I think he's guilty, all right.
It's just that the Bushistas are pushing this to try to take any focus off of Rove and, especially, Cheney. When will the MSM realize that there is enough guilt, and more, to go all the way around the Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yup
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 04:32 PM by nam78_two
and more importantly that it wasn't harmless water-cooler gossip :eyes: but a targetted take down....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Come on GUYS !
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 09:59 PM by Sam Odom
Armitage is taking the fall. Is it legit? I dont think he would do it for bushco, do you? He is either fully 'guilty' or taking the fall for Powell. Besides, taking this fall isn't that bad. What's going to happen to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. unbelievable.
someone outed an undercover CIA agent and no one is in prison. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC