Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gephardt said to be possible VP pick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:48 PM
Original message
Gephardt said to be possible VP pick
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 06:49 PM by quinnox
*Note this thread is based on a Kerry nomination, which is not assured. Clark or Edwards may yet emerge as a main rival for Kerry.



"There are two reasons Gephardt's backing is important to Kerry," said Donna Brazile, Al Gore's campaign manager in 2000. "Gephardt has a lot of credibility with labor. The states to come are labor intensive. Dick Gephardt has a lot of institutional support. He left the campaign on good graces. Dick Gephardt could conceivably be a potential VP candidate."

This might be a good ticket, instead of Kerry-Edwards (which I also like). Gephardt is from Missouri, which from what I understand is a key swing state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Darwin2002 Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's the most boring thing I've ever heard; we need pzazz not snooze
Edwards would draw much better in the south
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The Dem establishment never learns, do they?
But then again, *winning* is never one of their chief criteria, either!

This is frighteningly more and more like 1984 (the election).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The major difference between 2004 and 1984 is
Reagan was popular, and Bush isn't. You can only have a landslide when the incumbent's approval rating is well above 50 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Many of Ronnie's policies were unpopular, but the voters
in the center (apolitical) LIKED him better than they did Mondale. We really need to take note of that this year. And if I am not mistaken, Reagan's numbers were low at this point in 1984. Gary Hart *could* have excited these voters; Mondale never. Did the DNC understand this, or didn't they care??

After all, it was Mondale's TURN..... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dick "The Hit man" Gephardt would sure draw in a LOT of Dean supporters.
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 06:53 PM by Padraig18
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Gephardt is a great Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, great democrats organize 'Osama' ads, etc. .
he's a hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. I will not vote for this ticket
I will grudgingly vote for Kerry, but I absolutely will not vote for a Kerry/Gephardt ticket. That would just be an insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I heard a strategist say yesterday that Gephardt

would be a good addition because of the MidWest and labor cote. Desm need those votes to win and, by his reckoning, cannot win the entire South but may be able to win a couple of Southern states. I don't know that he's right but I'm not sure Edwards will go along with taking the VP nomination, as many assume. He has said many times that he will not be VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What Edwards has said:
He's never said he would not accept the VP nod; he's said (like Clark) that he is in this to become the nominee. Crucial distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:00 PM
Original message
Of course they'd say this!
Then, when both of them are out of the race for good, they'll both change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes.
no one enters the race to become VP. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio
Become locked for the Democrats if we put Gephardt on the ticket. I don't have a favorable opinion of Gephardt, but a Kerry-Gephardt ticket makes a bit of strategic sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'm not rooting for this ticket
but Gephardt would be a much better debater against Cheney, than Joe L was in 2000. At least he'd put up an argument, & still seem like a nice guy, compared to Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great One PRO War guy and One I-Dunno guy
I feel represented.


Ultimate D.C. careerists get the nomination - independents stay home in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disenfranchised Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Great post LuminousX
I'm 100% Edwards supporter, but I'm really liking Dean supporters more and more every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Yeah
Not a ticket I would feel comfortable supporting.

If Dean isn't the nominee, I will be spending a lot more time on the House and Senate threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bill Richardson is the man. If Gephardt motivated so few voters in Iowa,
If Gephardt motivated so few voters in Iowa, why would he motivate them as a vp nominee?

Governor Bll Richardson can deliver New Mexico and he has forieign policy experience. Go with Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Donna Brazile may not be the best authority on this
We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. But how connected is she with the DNC (establishment)?
Is she running up a trial balloon, or has this already been decided?? Does she KNOW who they have picked for us? And is it (____ help us!!!), Gep???

Champagne may be flowing in Rove's office tonight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Evan Bayh

He's from a red state and he won't upstage Kerry.

He also didn't completely blow the mid term elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HazMat Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Bayh is way too conservative on foreign policy
He disagrees deeply with Kerry's stance on the Iraq War. Bayh's Iraq position is closer to Lieberman's. Bahy is even more sickening than Lieberman, in that he always speaks glowingly of Bush. It's one thing to have non-dovish position about Iraq, it's another thing to say you agree with Bush. For example, Biden has a pretty similar Iraq position to Bayh, but he always vocally opposes Bush and always attempts to provide contrast between the Dem hawk Iraq position and the Repub/Neocon hawk Iraq position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. I Would be Aghast!
Gephardt just does not have the personality for a winning ticket. It doesn't matter whether he's a good Democrat -- when he talks people yawn. G finished fourth in a neighboring state where he had been strong.

I thought this election was at least about being electible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Electable??? Ha ha ha ha ha.....
Where did you get that idea??? Choosing the nominee(s) is about whose TURN it is!!! Hey, I have been observing this process since JFK (the first one, not Kerry). Nothing changes in the DNC's processes, no matter how horrible the repuke alternative.

Play nice, now, and get on board... You will learn to love it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
artr2 Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. The worst possible ticket
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 07:38 PM by artr2
I would rather see kerry (if he is nominated) go with Graham - He would be an excellent VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is Labor Even A Factor Any More?
All of the union members in the family or I know are far right-wing.

At work, the para-professionals are all members of AFSME. With a few exceptions, they are all far right-wing.

My impression is that there is a disconnect between union leadership and the rank and file. Or am I just surrounded by right-wingers and therefore have a skewed perception of the union electorate in general?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well I would still prefer Graham or
Edwards, we shouldn't give up on the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teevee99 Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. if gephardt and kerry are our choice
then i will stay home on election day. it will be a sad day. the democratic party will truly be nothing but a shadow party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Kerry/Gephardt 2004... The winning ticket!
I have no doubt that a Kerry/Gephardt ticket will resonate among our progressive friends, particularly those that opposed the war.

President, House Leadership Agree on Iraq Resolution



President George W. Bush along with bipartisan leaders from the House and Senate announced the Joint Resolution to authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces against Iraq. "The statement of support from the Congress will show to friend and enemy alike the resolve of the United States," President Bush said during the announcement in the Rose Garden, Wednesday, October 2, 2002. White House photo by Paul Morse.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. I believe David Broder wrote
either today or yesterday that Kerry should pick from Clark or Edwards. His thoughts were that choosing from those two would be a winner. It would complete all areas he thought in appeal accross the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. It's going to be one of the two, Edwards or Clark.
I think that's why the added tension between the two camps, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC