Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark On President Bush's Admission On Wmds And CIA Revelations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:45 PM
Original message
Clark On President Bush's Admission On Wmds And CIA Revelations
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 05:48 PM by maddezmom
For Immediate Release
Date: February 5, 2004


Statement Of General Wesley Clark On President Bush's Admission On Wmds And The Cia's Revelation That Iraq Was Not An "Imminent Threat"


Statement Of General Wesley Clark On President Bush's Admission On Wmds And The Cia's Revelation That Iraq Was Not An "Imminent Threat"
Little Rock - General Wesley Clark issued the following statement on today's revelations by President Bush and CIA Director George Tenet:

"Today, the CIA Director finally made clear what I have been saying since this campaign began - that Iraq did not pose an 'imminent threat' to the United States or its neighbors prior to the war, and the intelligence community never told President Bush that Iraq was an imminent threat. What's more, President Bush himself has admitted that the United States has not found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

"The facts now have been laid bare - the Bush Administration misled us into a war we didn't need to fight. He misled the American people. And the question now is: what did he know at the time? With no warning of an imminent threat, the American people have a right to know why, precisely, the President took us into this war.

"There has been too much distortion and manipulation of evidence; too much deceit. We need a higher standard of leadership in Washington. And since George W. Bush has gotten us into this mess, we need a strategy for success that will eventually get us out."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, but Kerry's was better
I especially liked Kerry's reference to 'sham commissions'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Clarks was first - like months ago. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clark is right on the money with this point.
Kerry can't go and sing a tune about imminent threat since he voted for the war. Clark is absolutely correct. I admire his coming forward and speaking the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's about time!....
The candidates need to start plugging holes into their claims/statements. Start throwing their
lies right back at their faces! Go Wesley Clark Go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clark was the first to ask, "Where is the intel?"
:puffpiece:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good statement, Wes.
And, yes, indeed, we do need a higher standard of leadership in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC