Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rant: Clark running for VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:35 PM
Original message
Rant: Clark running for VP?
No, he is not. Is he ready to drop out of the presidential race? No he is not. However, from the hundreds of posts we have seen on the topic of Clark as VP, it begs the question: Is Clark a good choice for VP? No, he is not.

What's the value of Wes Clark in the position of President of the Senate instead of a seasoned legislator? What's the value of Wes Clark in the White House, but NOT commander-in-chief? What's the value of Wes Clark, a man of action, in a basically wait-until-the-president-dies holding pattern?

Even if, God forbid, Clark doesn't win the nomination, this VP idea is nonsense. Secretary of State makes sense or Secretary of Defense, although since he's butted heads with the Pentagon so many times, and with the global respect he already pulls, I'd say State would show more immediate return; but VP for anybody, no, it does not make a bit of sense.

I'm not giving an inch here, Wes is my man until he decides otherwise, but I wish these VP posts would go away.

GO WES!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree! Wes is perfect for president...not VP
You are right..Sec. of State or Sec. of Defense would be second choice. We need to use his intelligence, military expertise and negotiation experience to help our nation out of this quagmire and bring back self respect to the USA. Only Wes can do that! We want Clark for President. Sec. of State..."ONLY AS A LAST RESORT!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have every right to rant about this
If Clark was running for VP, I don't think he would have jumped into the ring. He could have easily continued to speak out against Bush and work behind the scenes with the Democrats running for President in order to get on the VP list.

Running for President is brutal. I don't think Clark is stupid enough to put himself through this just to hope for the VP position. It's a ridiculous concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. A Nice ticket balancer

Clark would be a nice ticket balancer, but useless VP.

The best Veep in history was Harry Truman. He was a voracious advocate for the US citizen in Congress and kept it up while Veep.

A Veep needs to be a real insider to be effective. Nope, I think that Clark's role in a Kerry administration would be as Defense Secretary or Secretary of State.

I don't think ANY of the current presidential candidates would make a good VP for Kerry. Edwards is relatively new to Washington. The fact that he is giving up his Senate seat would imply that he might take the job. However, together both of them are too 'east coast'.

Kerry would need a Veep from the heartland. I would suggest the bland but effective Evan Bayh of Indiana. Son of the late dove Birch Bayh. He's basically an Al Gore clone. He comes from a "red" state that is dominated by agriculture. He's a real "heartland" guy. He would probably tilt Indiana to the Democrats in the presidential election. There is a democratic Governer in Indy so we wouldn't give up a seat in the Senate.

Actually, I think a shrewd move for ANY of the democrats would be offering the Defense secretary post to Indiana's senior senator Dick Lugar. It's a good reach across the aisle and would effectively hand a Senate seat to the Democrats.


If Edards gets the nomination, he will need a senior statesman as a veep to balance out his "young" image. He would need an older Senator or Rep from the heartland. I have no idea who.

If Clark gets the nomination, Edwards would be the perfect Veep. The so-called "tort reform" is a big issue. The Republicans will be sure to bring it up in the general election. Edwards can speak with authority about whats REALLY wrong with the judicial process. He can talk in long length (Nader fashion) about how corporations screw over the little guy and those lawyers are really there to protect consumers.


Dean would make a perfect Health and Human Services head for any of the Democrats.

Kucinich should parlay his presidential run into a Senate run. He's a real Harry Truman type whose time hasn't come yet. He needs to raise is visibility and become the beacon of core democratic values.

Michael Moore - Jeesh, run for congress already!!!! You've got guts and the standing in Michigan to defeat some Republican Thug.

Ted Nugent - PLEASE run for governor of Michigan. I want to see you crash and burn after people find out what YOU did to get out of the war. It makes George Bush look like the bravest man in the world.

Joe Lieberman - Who cares. Your not really a democrat anyway.

Hillary Clinton - Denounce NAFTA and WTO. Come clean that you and your hubby made a TERRIBLE mistake that is unworking the very fabric of democracy. Denounce your former Wal-Mart masters.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well this post rates a WOW! from me. Can't find a single
thing to disagree with. Especially love the idea of Chickenhawk Nugent getting his pseudomacho ass handed to him on a platter.

And Wes would be a great, great Secretary of State. The 55 US ambassadors and diplomats who just endorsed him know perfectly well their jobs would be much easier and themselves much safer with him as CinC or as SecState.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Kerry has said that he would consider
John McCain as Sec of Defense.
They are really close friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree, with Clark till it's over. Just gave another donation...
:dem::kick::)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Though that was THE qualification for V.P. -- a good person for President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. In ordinary times, yes
But these are extraordinary times, when every bit of talent needs to be directed appropriately. VP is not the best use of Clark's talents, experience and ability.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Agree completely
If Clark does not win the nomination, I would prefer to see him leave politics, because I think he is really too good for this process.
I can't see him becoming a cog in the wheel of the bureacracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sec of State would be a good fit
IF the pres thing doesn't work out.

I also think that if Kerry gets the nod, he needs to pre-assemble his team before hand. I know, procedure, they have to be confirmed. but it can be insinuated,

Lets face it, Kerry has a few weaknesses. and there would still be some divisions within the party. but if the American people knew that there was a qualified and capable team waiting to take over, it might increase the Democrat's chances. If the grassroots knew that say Clark was slotted to be nominated for Sec of State they would get behind the ticket a little harder and with $$$ more than Kerry alone. This primary season has showcased some very talented individuals. Kerry needs them on his team and out stumping in November.

a few elections ago in Canada, Chretien ran with a message showcasing his 'team' and how qualified it was, as he was seen as a bit of a weak candidate for prime minister.
the 'team' would make up for it.

I think after the 3 year of bushit Americans will pay more attention to who is Sec of State or AG, uughhhh Ashcroft.

just a thought
still pulling, pushing and pleading for the preferred outcome, President Wesley Clark


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Secr of State is a fit for sure
But President is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I agree.
We must stay focused. Clark would never be anyone's VP. I am actually feeling better about the campaign. He was great on Aaron Brown and at least they aren't totally ignoring him now! If God forbid he is not the next President, I hope he writes a book about how our Government and the Media are ingrates when it comes to veterans! :)

Back to Work for me. U WES A!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC