Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: US open to NATO-led force in Lebanon: Bolton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:29 AM
Original message
Reuters: US open to NATO-led force in Lebanon: Bolton
US open to NATO-led force in Lebanon: Bolton

By Jeremy Pelofsky
Reuters
Sunday, July 23, 2006; 10:00 AM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is open to a NATO-led force keeping
the peace on Lebanon's southern border with Israel, although using U.S. forces
has not been discussed, a senior Bush administration official said on Sunday.

Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said his country could accept a NATO
peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon to ensure Hizbollah is removed from the
border. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had earlier said calls for an
international force were premature.

"It's a new idea, we'll certainly take it seriously," John Bolton, the U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations, said in a taped interview with CNN's "Late
Edition."

"We have been looking carefully at a multinational force perhaps authorized
by the Security Council, but not a U.N.-helmeted force," he said.
<snip>

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/23/AR2006072300157.html

Also this from Josh Bolten via the Associated Press...

Posted on Sun, Jul. 23, 2006

U.S. unlikely to send troops to Lebanon

HOPE YEN
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Bush's chief of staff said Sunday international peacekeepers
might be needed in Lebanon to help end the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah
militants, but that U.S. troop involvement was unlikely.

Josh Bolten reaffirmed comments by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Friday,
ahead of her trip to the Middle East this week, that she did not think "it anticipated
that U.S. ground forces are expected" for a potential peacekeeping contingent.
<snip>

Full article: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/15105954.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. nato is not going to send troops
because they are not legally able to do so,only the un can and bush knows this. he`s burning every bridge he can possibly find and i wonder if he will be invited to any world conference in the next two years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC