|
I was checking out the Congressional Power Ranking today, and started wondering what formula I would use to formulate Democratic power rankings across the board that would include Democrats who are not currently holding office. Certainly Bill Clinton and Al Gore have huge influence within the party, as do John Edwards and Wes Clark.
One category to use in the formula would be media buzz, and Google News would provide a great starting point for that. However, that would pose a problem because, for example, there are more than one "Mark Warners" in the listings. But just as an example, using Google news, here are the top 10 Democrats with the most buzz. The numbers represent how many articles they're appearing in in Google News:
Bill Clinton: 11,500 John Kerry: 10,700 Hillary Clinton: 8,020 Al Gore: 5,960 John Edwards: 4,880 Harry Reid 4,710 Nancy Pelosi 4,510 Charles Schumer 3,450 Ted Kennedy 3,030 Howard Dean: 2,980
Each of the top 10 get a certain amount of points here.
Another category would be do they hold an an important and influential leadership position? In this category, Howard Dean would get the most points, followed by such names as Reid, Pelosi, and Schumer. Democrats not in the Buzz top 10 might very well enter the overall top 10 for holding important leadership positions - like Rahm Emmanuel and Steny Hoyer.
But what if they hold an elective office combined with the leadership position? Would the size of the state matter? Would Pelosi overtake Dean based on being the minority leader AND a Rep from California?
Which would garner more points? A senator or a congress person? How would tenure play into it?
Then, of course, there would be a public voting poll for people to add some extra points on to their favorite before the final tally is made.
Thoughts?
|