|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 03:51 PM Original message |
Does ANYONE understand the value of the control of the Committees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 03:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If we have to examine all democrats then you're right but then we lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. We agree that committee chairs matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. So you are telling me that John Conyers would make a terrible committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Well you know we can all trust James Sensenbrenner!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. A majority means we can not only have the hearings but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. And we can gavel shut meetings we don't like the outcome of, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. The other arguement is, do those committee chairs mean so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Controlling the high ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, I do. And I would vote for a Million "DINOs" to be rid of PAT ROBERTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Pat Roberts, Intelligence Committee Chair - what a fricking oxymoran! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. Let me paint a picture for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. How does this play out with the Lieberman situation, now that Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think you're right, although I never looked at it that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 05:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. even more reason to vote democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 10:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I don't think so. I think it is already quite obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
15. Great post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-13-06 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
16. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Of course. I'm just not convinced the argument succeeds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-14-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. more of the same ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC