Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if the FBI raids the NY Times building?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:06 AM
Original message
What if the FBI raids the NY Times building?
Interesting scenario outlined by Dennis Persica of The Times-Picayune. A few years ago it probably would have seemed far-fetched, even for Bush. Today, it seems rather plausible, maybe even likely.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/06/28/when_the_fbi_raids_the_times.php

What if the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York—bolstered by a cadre of federal marshals or FBI agents—entered the offices of The New York Times, looking to rummage through the paper’s files and computers either to find the source of the leaks for the banking story or to make sure the Times isn’t about to publish another story allegedly damaging to national security?

In raising this possibility, I am not suggesting the administration would do this to shut down all news media and establish an authoritarian regime. Let’s just assume the government has good intentions—guarding the nation’s security—when it orders the raid. But historians and polemicists of all political stripes know that since the dawn of humanity the road to catastrophe has often been paved with good intentions.

< snip >

Consider the implications of this hypothetical scenario: Agents search the files inside The New York Times building. Perhaps some of those files are carted out; maybe even computer drives are taken. Such a scenario would make the Pentagon Papers dispute look like a minor disagreement among gentlemen. In that case, the government tried to stop the Times and other newspapers from printing a particular story. A raid, on the other hand, would shut down the entire paper. If it wanted to get really tough, the government could treat the Times as an enemy collaborator, seal off its headquarters and move toward seizing its assets.

Meanwhile, the administration could count on a portion of the blogosphere—as well as talk radio and cable TV personalities—to cheer on the raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will mean that the Bush adminstration's transformation to fascism ...
will be virtually complete.

The only thing left to complete the picture will be the ovens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd say the owner-publishers of all major newspapers....
had better have emergency after=hour numbers for a Federal judge on speed-dial. I just hope there is some way back from this abyss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Without a warrant, they'd be in DEEP shit
Bushetals are bold and arrogant, but I really don't think storming the office of the NYT without a warrant would be tolerated. Yes, there would be the polemics leading cheers, but they'd fall on deaf ears.

Without a warrant, they're toast and would have impeachment proceedings by the end of the month. On second thought...I hope they DO try it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC