Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what are the odds that the dead soldiers weren't tortured?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:22 PM
Original message
what are the odds that the dead soldiers weren't tortured?
of course, if they were tortured by their captors it would be awful. and my heart breaks for two kids who shouldn't have been there in the first place. and it breaks even more for their families.

what's the likelihood, though, that this is a u.s. psy-ops jedi mindfuck to create more hatred toward the insurgency? when they're just blowing up things, it's a little easier for us to say, "it's their country. let them have it."

but when we believe they're torturing our soldiers, it becomes easier for this administration to manipulate us. we want to hurt and hurt badly anyone who does that to our guys. and the bushies know how they desperately need public opinion on their side.

the really sick thing is, i believe that if those boys weren't tortured (and i so hope they weren't) in their last hours, the bush bunch would have no compunction about telling the world that they were just to swing opinion their way a little.

just thinking out loud.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish I could tell you...
that you are all squishy in the head and you need to get off the crack for thinking those things, but I can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't buy your argument, I'm not for a second suggesting Bush.........
.....would hesitate to use anything and everything for his gain but even that would be a bit much for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I don't think for one moment that it is a bit much for this administration
to say this..look at all the other stuff that they made up...just remember Tillman, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I appreciate your thoughts
but I sincerely believe that members of bush's base in this country could not possibly care less whether our kids are dying in Iraq regardless of how they die. The torture and beheading angle for them is, wow look how not outraged liberals are. So let us keep them their indefinitely to show how the republican party supports them. It is so freaking easy to rile up a bush supporter.

You are so right, Psy-ops is all about jedi mindfucking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then it would be extremely cruel to the families of the soldiers
Not to just the families of the two soldiers who were POW's, but to all families of deployed soldiers who have yet another new horror to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. zero percent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe they were tortured and killed with powerdrills before death.
Edited on Wed Jun-21-06 12:39 PM by Poll_Blind
It's all the rage in Baghdad. What I've read makes what the serial killer Dhalmer (sp?) did to his victims pale. It's an extreme understatement to indicate that it's not a pleasent or quick way to die. I don't think they wanted to die any more than I do, but if I were in a situation like they were I would much rather have been shot to death than surrender to them. In a heartbeat.

I have a fantastic imagination but some of the things that people do to others is...unimaginable.

OnEdit: Their bodies were booby-trapped and rigged with explosives, btw. I don't have time to provide links but Google and Google News will be useful should you try to learn more.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think the allegations of torture are premature
at the very least. Remember, they need to bring them back here to do full DNA testing to confirm the bodies belong to the two missing soldiers. That means the bodies were at least battered or burned beyond recognition.

So far, the Iraqis have been more civilized to captured Americans than Americans have been to them. Yes, they have beaten most and executed some. However, they have not kept them caged, raped them with objects, or threatened their wives and children with rape. They haven't been waterboarded or chained in impossible positions for hours, nor have they been hooded and stood on stools with electrodes attached and threatened with shock.

I disbelieve anything until the final word is out, and I am often skeptical even then. Right now, all we know is the bodies weren't recognizable. I think we need to wait for an autopsy to determine pre mortem versus post mortem injuries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Not to be too pushy, but they "claim" they have to be brought back for DNA
testing. Honestly, we have no way of knowing whether the torture report is true or not. Just pointing out that the only way we "know" the bodies weren't recognizable is bcs the government has said so. Consider the sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. that's easy to answer, actually....
The odds that the captured soldiers were not tortured before they were killed are identical to the odds that our government and the MSM are spreading disinformation about their fate. Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why, were they being held at gitmo? Abu Ghraib?
Torture is fair game these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. 10-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. How come Al Qaeda in Iraq does not follow Geneva conventions
which expressly prohibit bodily harm to captured soldiers?
If the story of these two soldiers being tortured in a
barbaric way is true, the entire civilized world should
condemn the barbarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. We reap what we sew.
This should reflect badly back at the source of barbaric behavior, the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusGail Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Geneva Convention
If Bush can pick and choose when to follow the Geneva Convention, then why not anybody else? Would I be drawing a long bow to say that Bush and his buddies were responsible for the torture and murder of the two marines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The beheadings started in the 9th century
in India when the muslim marauders first arrived there.
And the forced conversions to islam continued for 8 centuries
until the muslim invaders were defeated by a hindu warlord.

The result is, India now has the 2nd largest muslim population
(after Indonesia).

Americans are just getting exposed to radical islam. My ancestors
from India have been familiar with it for centuries. The 911 attack
as shocking as it was in death and destruction did not surprise me
one bit. Typical M.O. of religious radicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Honestly, I don't really give a shit
Edited on Wed Jun-21-06 11:41 PM by Hippo_Tron
2500+ dead soldiers and 30,000+ dead Iraqi Civillians (that number I believe is if you don't count the initial bombings in which case it's more like 100,000) is enough to more than enough to convince me that the situation over there needs to be dealt with and fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC