Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark needs to play up the fact that he was an Economics Professor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 03:02 PM
Original message
Clark needs to play up the fact that he was an Economics Professor.
Edwards beat Clark among people citing the economy as their main concern. I think Clark should emphasize his background in economics. What does anyone else think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a winning angle for Clark.
Not many people know that about him. As a former teacher (though not public high school teacher) he understands the basic flaw in No Child Left Behind: you don't punish schools that are having trouble. You focus resources there so that everybody can have a good education.

The fact that he taught economics is even better. His fiscal policy is sound: he'll stop the exporting of jobs overseas, balance the budget, and still give tax cuts to middle- and lower-income families.

He's too modest, IMO. Needs to toot his own horn a little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. waaaay too humble
but he has so many incredible attributes, I understand why he is hard to package
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's hard to make things stand out
when your re'sume' is so stellar.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where was he an economics professor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. At West Point in the early '70s, after Vietnam. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. with all the "free trade" "send our jobs to India" crap he's spewed
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 03:22 PM by WhoCountsTheVotes
it might be best for him to keep quiet about it, frankly. Market fundamentalism doesn't play any better than religious fundamentalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Now you very well know that's a gross soundbite
Clark said, the jobs have gone to India, and they aren't coming back. Let's make new tech and new research to do even better.....AND that if companies do outsourse, let's hit them with tax penalties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. “AND that if companies do outsource, let's hit them with tax penalties”
That’s a perfect incentive for companies to move their corporate headquarters across the border to Mexico or Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. amen
these candidates are trying to punish American producers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Whatever
Reaching much?

Transaction amount: $50.00
Transaction id: 28072
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Here's some good info on this topic
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 04:23 PM by NRK
http://clark04.com/issues/jobcreation/

# Tax Incentives to Keep Manufacturing Jobs in the U.S. General Clark supports current legislative efforts to keep and expand production in the United States. To that end, as President, Wes Clark would institute a 90-day review of all tax and spending provisions affecting large manufacturing firms with a particular focus on whether any tax and spending provisions provide manufacturing firms an incentive to move jobs overseas. As President, General Clark would support initiatives that could provide manufacturing firms the incentive to keep (and expand) manufacturing jobs in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. WOW he taught Economics 101...
next thing you know, someone will suggest that he replace Greenspan.

Clark is pro-free-trade. Voting for Clark is like voting for another 8 years of the pukefest mutual masturbation of William JEfferson Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. do you have
evidence that he only ever taught Eco101?

He has a masters in Economics from Oxford. He could probably teach a higher-level class, dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. So because he's a macro-fundamentalist...
you think he is fit to be president?

Clark is in my eyes disgraceful. He is pro-free-trade. He is the Ahnuld of the candidates (he is always speaking in platitudes). He bombed Serbians in the "fight against Communism".

need I say more?

Oh, he wants to tax the rich more...so we'll outsource more jobs of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. nice dodge
I asked if you had any evidence that all he taught was Econ101 and you switched to another topic entirely.

Do you have any evidence that all he taught was Econ101?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes
he taught it at Westpoint. Look it up. I'm not your encyclopaedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You're the one who made the assertion....
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 04:46 PM by Dookus
:shrug:

on edit: All I can find is info that he taught economics at West Point. I can't find anything that says he ONLY taught Economics 101, which is your assertion. If you have the info, why not just provide it? You may very well be right - I have no idea what courses he taught. but you made a factual assertion, and should be able to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. not a good idea
First of all, nobody cares. Economists are not as respected as generals.

I would like to know what kind of economics background he has myself.

If he learned and taught in the neoclassical tradition his background might be more a liability than a strength, unless he now realizes what he learned and taught is useless in the real world and should never be applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC