Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sherrod Brown & Ned Lamont Urge Liberals to Push Progressive Vision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:10 AM
Original message
Sherrod Brown & Ned Lamont Urge Liberals to Push Progressive Vision
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 01:11 AM by OzarkDem
More generally, Brown said that “progressives” should take definite stands rather than blurring differences with GOP opponents on policy issues. Brown dismissed that as “Republican lite,” and instead exhorted liberals to highlight their differences with their opponents. “Make the sharp contrast between what they have done and a bold, progressive version of what progressives can do,” Brown said.

This is not a risk-free pronouncement for Brown, who is running for the Senate in a swing state that narrowly favored President Bush in the 2004 election. The National Republican Senatorial Committee, in a statement Wednesday, said that Brown “must feel right at home with the liberal elites at the conference” but that his “liberal credentials” would not play well in Ohio.

Brown argued, though, that his views on a host of issues — supporting an increase in the minimum wage, overhauling the Medicare prescription drug program and opposing the Iraq war — actually are in the mainstream of political thought.

“On issue after issue after issue, I’m exactly as progressives are, exactly where the public is,” Brown said.

Brown, who holds liberal views on social issues, is running in a state that has a strain of social conservatism that includes opposition to gun controls and same-sex marriage. Brown noted that the 10 Ohio counties with the poorest economies favored Bush in 2004, when a state constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage also was on the ballot and passed overwhelmingly.

...

Saying No to Joe: Lamont also was on message at the meeting, making his appearance on a separate panel entitled “Eruptions: The Public Moves Against the War.” Lamont offered a rousing speech outlining what he said was the Democratic Party’s inability to take a strong stand on Iraq — which he and his supporters blame in part on the hawkish Lieberman’s justifications for Bush’s war policies.

“I think it’s high time the Democrats stand up and stop mumbling,” Lamont said regarding opposition to the war. “Say it loud and clear.”


http://www.cqpolitics.com/2006/06/brown_lamont_urge_liberals_to.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would vote for both of them if I could!
but I can't. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll share my vote with you
They are both great, the future of Dem leadership in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Go Brown, go Lamont. It would be a stronger blue shade of Senate
if these two could win their respective races.

And both are looking good right now. Brown out in front of DeWine by a handful and Ned moving up on Joe in CT.

Very encouraging prospects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Imagine both of them in the Senate -- and Bernie Sanders from Vermont too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Sherrod and Bernie are good friends
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 12:04 PM by OzarkDem
they work together on a lot of legislation. Ned Lamont sounds pretty good too.

Agree, having them all in the Senate together could make a big difference. The spirit of Wellstone would be smiling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ya, then we can start getting back to the business of actually moving
the country forward -- instead of just holding the line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The Progressive Establishment in Congress can do it
Some of these "old heads" as we used to call ourselves, have been there through the long drought of the Bush years and are ready to move forward with the bipartisan agenda they crafted back in the late 1990's.

Sometimes I don't think people realize how close Bill Clinton and Al Gore brought us to crafting the best public policy that our country has seen in decades.

Sherrod and Bernie and Arlen and others used to work in a bipartisan fashion to come up with some of the most innovative and forward thinking public policy that we've seen in a long time.

Hillary is starting to get back to it also, with health care reform. If we can put our top leaders together again with their brilliant minds we can turn the country around and start planning for our future again.

We have the plan
We have the power
We have the commitment
We can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. It wasn't clear to me ... is this a coordinated effort for these two or ..
are these two unrelated statements?

It would be kinda cool if these two were somehow coordinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. On same panel discussion at Take Back America 2006 conference
The two have similar views and both want to see the party and grassroots speak out more against the war and be more forceful in advocating progressive policies. As Sherrod says, the GOP may call his POV liberal, but his views are exactly the same as the majority of Americans today - progressive values on key issues are now mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC