Im going to support Kerry

[CTLawGuy]

by voting for Nader. In this way it will force Nader to go to the UN before running for president.

I'm doing it to protect the Democratic party by demonstrating a threat of force against the Republicans.

Before I go into the poll to vote for Nader I will call him and half-heartedly try to convince him to drop out of the race for the good of the Left.

Besides, Nader doesn't need my vote to run anyway, so it doesn't matter whether I vote for him or not.

Don't you dare call me inconsistent. Voting for Nader is completely consistent with wanting Kerry to win. You people obviously don't understand nuance.

And that guy over there, he claims to be against voting for Nader, but he tried to nominate Dean, so that proves he really wants Kerry to lose. That makes the guy a hypocrite.

I only like nader when he is popular. When people hate him, I blame him for deceiving me, even though many other people weren't fooled. but when he gives a great speech, I praise him. I am being completely consistent by doing this.

Lastly, you shouldn't hold my decision against me, because you need me to win in the future. and its obvious that anyone who gets away with an undesiriable behavior will magically reverse his behavior when a similar situation comes up in the future.

[Moderator]

1. Locking

2. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

DU Moderator