The measure is expected to assert that operations in Iraq are part of a global "war on terror" and to express "resolve" to complete the mission.
Gee who wants to sign their name to NOT having the resolve to complete the mission-whatever that meansHouse Democratic leaders are awaiting the resolution's final wording before announcing their position on it.
Glad they aren't doing anything like getting out ahead of something and pointing out how stupid and wasteful this whole hot air excercise isDebate on the resolution is expected to come Thursday, after a vote on a compromise version of a $94.5 billion emergency spending bill. Of that, $70.4 billion will pay for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But Norman Ornstein, an expert on White House and congressional relations with the American Enterprise Institute think tank, said putting Iraq in the spotlight exemplifies Bush political strategist Karl Rove's mantra that "the best defense is a good offense."
"That's Karl's playbook all the way - turn weakness into strength," Ornstein said. "Republicans still believe that no matter how much people are unhappy with what happens in Iraq, that when the crunch time comes with voters, ... the Democrat Party can be portrayed as a weak party."
Wedge wedge wedge wedge wedge. Hey Dems don't count on being able to fall back on the "but but they said it was about something else" defense-HAVE you learned that yet?http://news.tbo.com/news/nationworld/MGBA7MU8COE.htmlThis whole thing makes me sick.