(O.K. all you Deaniacs, how did you miss this interview? This is related to the RFK Jr. Election 2004 article.)
6/5/06, 1:17 pm EST
Rolling Stone: How confident are you Ohio in 2004 was fairly decided?
Howard Dean: I’m not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We did our own Democratic party study in Ohio with a panel of experts. We absolutely know that there was a systematic voter suppression. We couldn’t say one way or another if the election was stolen. We couldn’t rule it out, but we couldn’t prove that it was. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. That’s clear.
RS: Were you caught off guard by the scale of the vote suppression campaign?
HD: We all know about the Republican culture of corruption. It should not be a surprise that the Republicans are willing to do things that are unethical to manipulate elections. That’s what we suspect has happened, and we’d like to safeguard our elections so that democracy can still be counted on to work.
The Republicans, we believe, have a different motive. They believe the less votes the better. Republicans like to suppress votes because they believe they do better in small turnouts. Characteristically, Democrats would rather lose an election with a huge turnout than win one with a small turnout because we think that the values of democracy have to be placed above the interests of the party. The reason that Republicans are such failures at governing is because they place the interests of their party ahead of the interests of the country.
(more at link)
<
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/?p=175>
Also, check out these related posts too:
<
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x432025>
<
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2665256&mesg_id=2665256>