Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: Facing Re-Election, Schwarzenegger Switches Course

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 09:31 PM
Original message
WSJ: Facing Re-Election, Schwarzenegger Switches Course
The Wall Street Journal

He's Baaack

Facing Re-Election, Schwarzenegger Switches Course

Huge Spending Plans Revive His Fortunes in California While Irking Republicans
'Whatever It Takes, I Will Do'
By CHRISTOPHER COOPER and JIM CARLTON
June 3, 2006; Page A1

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Six months ago, voters beached Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget-paring, anti-union political plans by defeating them at the polls, sending his approval ratings into free-fall. Even his own daughters turned against him, the Republican governor recalls, when they heard about a bill he'd signed that aimed to save money by speeding up the euthanization of animals at state-owned shelters.

Facing re-election this fall, Mr. Schwarzenegger has made a rapid about-face, embracing a decidedly populist style. He increased government spending 9% this year, including an extra $5 billion for schools, and has proposed the largest bond issue ever put before voters in any state. It will appear alongside his name on November's gubernatorial ballot. In the technology-obsessed streets of Sacramento, the man many used to call the "Governator," a nod to one of his most popular movie roles, is now known as "Arnold 2.0."

The spending spree by one of the country's most prominent Republicans flies in the face of what's happening elsewhere in the U.S. for one reason -- it appears to be winning voter support. Republicans in other states have been hammered for their tax and spend policies. President Bush has promised a spending crackdown to placate conservatives unhappy with the expansion of federal borrowing. The president still faces the prospect of Republican voters staying at home during this November's midterm elections in protest.

Mr. Schwarzenegger has taken the opposite tack -- openly seeking the support of liberals and Democrats, even as he risks offending Republican stalwarts. His approach is starting to pay dividends in the polls, where his performance is steadily improving. Sitting in an overstuffed wicker chair in his "smoking tent," set in the courtyard of the state capitol, Mr. Schwarzenegger said the policies from 2005 were "my mistake." Explaining his switch, he added: "I always like to win. I don't get hung up on ideology. Whatever it takes, I will do."

Beyond spending, Mr. Schwarzenegger is embracing other issues dear to his new Democratic allies, such as cutting car emissions and raising the state's minimum wage. The Democrats Mr. Schwarzenegger once branded "girlie men" are now barnstorming the state with him. "Sometimes, I have to remind myself he's a Republican," says California Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez, who described himself as Schwarzenegger's "biggest nemesis" just six months ago when the governor vetoed all but one of his bills. The liberal Los Angeles assemblyman says he will back Mr. Schwarzenegger's Democratic challenger this fall, but he makes no secret of his closeness to the governor, dining regularly at the former movie star's lavish Brentwood home.

(snip)


URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114929977605070581.html (subscription)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey Arnie-- YOU SUCK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Arnold owes Culliforniuh SIX BILLION DOLLARS
By renegotiating the Enron settlement. He can NEVER be regarded as fiscally responsible. NEVER FORGET THAT!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Westly has the best chance of beating Arnie
according to all the polls. I hope he gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush has NEVER vetoed a spending bill - biggest spender in US history
yet the right wing media repeats over and over that the republicans and bushco are conservative and financially
responsible.

and arnold's big spending is..ta da....tacking on bonds debt that future generations will have to pay. This sound familiar?

and the $5 billion school spending? just give back of money that was already earmarked for schools and arnold reneged.

sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
batik * digital art
mugs and shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I find it hard to believe that there are Democrats who still support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. There are. The ones who are disgusted by the mud being thrown
by Angelides and Westly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Arnie is just as bad if not worse.
I hope the GE brings a better result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. is cali running a deficit?
where is the money for this spending coming from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes
The state still has a structural deficit -- in which continuing costs exceed projected revenue -- of $2.5 billion. A recent analysis from the California legislature says that by 2008, the state will face a budget shortfall of at least $5 billion, possibly more if the economy falters.

Even after Moody's and Standard & Poor's upgraded their debt ratings, California still ranks 49th among the 50 states, ahead of only hurricane-ravaged Louisiana. The new bond issue would push the state's overall debt load to nearly 6% of its $100 billion operating budget, close to the level most debt-rating companies consider dangerous.

====

What bothers me from the article is the comment that "But California relies more heavily on income taxes than other states to meet its budget, and these taxes, which fall disproportionately on wealthier citizens, tend to be more susceptible to economic swings than other types of revenue."

If not income tax which is progressive, what? Property tax that are now hitting people all across the country just because people are cash poor but house rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And what was the size of the deficit when Gray Davis was recalled?
Are things better or worse in Cali now?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. They are better for the simple reason that the economy has improved
since Davis, more jobs and more income tax revenue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. CA would be $6 billion ahead revenue-wise with the Enron settlement
Edited on Sun Jun-04-06 03:35 PM by rocknation
That is I why I say that voters should NEVER forget that Arnie torpedoed it (and his Dem challengers DEFINITELY shouldn't). There should be nothing Arnie can do before November that can cancel out that "debt."

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lumpy can bite me.
Can't stand the a-hole. He is entirely full of crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Whatever it takes, I will do"....now there is a real ethical sounding sob
While I like that he is giving money back to Californians through services and such, any Democrat would do the same. Don't be fooled California....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And yet. Many of us here cheered another Arnold
the fictional Arnold Vinick of the West Wing as a moderate Republican who refused to cower under the "base" of bible thumping, gay bashing, women haters.

If Schwarzenegger wins perhaps this will send a message to more Republicans who have been banished from the party that there is a room for one who concentrate on the issues (more or less) and not pandering to the church goers. That one can run on policies, not on one's claim of talk to god, or Jesus, or Allah, or Yahweh, or what have you.

And perhaps then we can worry about the future of this country and the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Ahnuld's been banished from the GOP?
Did I miss the memo? What's more likely is this will send a message to Repubs that they can flip=flop as much as they like and their friends in the media will make them sound like heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Facing re-election this fall, Mr. Schwarzenegger has made a rapid
abuout-face. What's the difference between that and a flip-flop? Maybe some right wing media whore can explain it to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's only a flip-flop if Democrats do it apparently n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC