Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Containers and Port Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:00 AM
Original message
Containers and Port Security
I have just submitted the following LTTE to my local newspaper. It should go over well in my "red" county, but I feel it will be published without problem......


"Gone practically unnoticed and definitely under reported is a story about a committee vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.

An amendment submitted in the House Homeland Security Committee by Rep. Edward Markey(D-MA) to require overseas scanning, under U.S. government supervision, of all U.S. bound cargo and also requiring tamper proof seals on the cargo, was defeated 18-16 on a mostly party-line vote.

According to Markey, intelligence since 9/11, has long told us that the holy grail of terrorism is to bring a nuclear device to the U.S. shore. And experts from all walks of American think tanks assure us that when less than 5% of all marine containers are being inspected before going inland, as they still are nearly five years after 9/11. these vessels would be the best and easiest way of accomplishing it.

Republicans on the committee were under fire from a coalition of business interests such as The Business Leaders Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to defeat the amendment. The Business Leaders Association represents business outlets such as Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Target, and Best Buy. All are companies who really don't want the cost or hassles of any security measures that will raise their costs, or inconvenience them in any way.

And the irony of ironies is that Rep. Peter King(R-NY), the congressman who is literally screaming because cuts in the homeland security budget, which he voted for after it was requested by the Bush Administration, were passed along to New York City, is the Republican Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee!

As a Vice-President and a National Security Advisor turned Secretary of State once made a point of telling us...."we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud" in Dallas or anywhere else.

But these companies, and several others, keep reminding Republicans, some at GOP fundraisers that they hold themselves, that profits suffer when some areas of Homeland Security are covered. And as long as our elected representatives in Congress continue to put those needs above Homeland Security, all that the average American citizen can do is hold our collective breath, and hope that some terrorist isn't smarter than the head of some special interest group with the ear of Peter King and his cohorts."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. corporate control of the Congress, the executive, and even . . .
parts of the judiciary is the most under-reported (and under-discussed) issue of all . . .

until that changes, not much else will . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Which means..........
.......SUPPORT YOU LOCAL DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER......don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. well, that depends on the Democrat . . .
there are plenty of Dems who are just as deeply entrenched in the corporatocracy as any Republican . . . think Joe Lieberman . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes I know.....but....
...when you have the MAJORITY, you have the POWER....Joe Lieberman's be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Exactly - support your local Dems in November
Its the ONLY way to make the necessary changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Markey Rules ..
He doesn't get a lot of attention, but rather than crying about how unfair it is to be in the minority he actual doesn't stop fighting. He is also the lead in the net neutrality fight.
I sent him an immigration "brick". Hope he didn't take it personally but he actually understands that guest workers are slaves and is not inclined to endorse slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Markey fights for what he believes in....like many others........
....from Massachucetts!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. All containers for Walmart and JC Penney
do not get inspected. They are exempt.

The 5% that do get inspected belong mostly to little guys and if they do get pulled out, they charge them a few $1000 for the favor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wasnt this Kerrys big security issue?
Shh ... he forgot to tell us there was a vote coming up?
Be vewwwy kwiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. And the real kicker
Is that by subjecting all containers to the same inspection, the cost per container would be greatly reduced, as it would be spread out and the cost shared by more shippers. But God (or a compliant Congress) forbid that Wal-Mart pay more to import cheap junk from overseas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not to mention the king of retailers that hold Repug fund raisers.........
.........HOME DEPOT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC