If anyone should be angry that the media is ignoring them

[BurtWorm]

it should Kucinich people! They didn't even bother to show his numbers tonight. Like they had no room for all seven candidates! :grr:

[Bad Thoughts]

1. That's true

Kucinich was barely mentioned all evening and ought to have been.

[bigtree]

2. Where is he?

[BurtWorm]

5. Who knows? The media pretended it was between six candidates!

:wtf:

[ringmastery]

3. maybe if your guy got more than 1%

they would show him.

Sorry, but kucinich is unelectable. He had a year to get more than a blip in the polls. He didn't do that. Game over.

[BurtWorm]

6. He's not my guy. Dean is my guy.

But why should CNN give Kucinich people the brush off like that? Sharpton's numbers went up even when he had 1%. Why not Kucinich?

[WilliamPitt]

13. 5% in NM, 2% in AZ, 3% in ND

with 42 + 5 primaries and almost 4,000 delegates still on the table.

So there's that. :)

[ChiefJoseph]

4. Question for DK people

If you're made that they're ignoring DK, do you think people like Larouche should be on stage during the debates?

[Lydia Leftcoast]

11. What is this, the new snarky Establishment talking point?

Once and for all, Lyndon LaRouche is a longstanding nutcase with a bunch of followers who are the closest thing to Moonies that you're going to find outside the Moonies. (Have you ever tried to have a rational conversation with a LaRouchite? You'd probably have better luck with a Moonie.)

He's an ultraright anti-Semite with ideas that Robert Ludlum would find paranoid, and who runs as a Dem to be annoying.

Dennis has more political experience than either Edwards or Clark, and his Congressional district has more people than Vermont.

The snide, dismissive "Kucinich=LaRouche" crap is getting really, really old. Find a new talking point.

[SeveneightyWhoa]

7. Shouldn't you be GLAD that they didnt show his numbers?

Wouldn't that have been a little embarassing? If I was a Kucinich supporter, I'd be relieved.

[BurtWorm]

8. Relieved that they don't deem you significant enough to report about?

I'm a Dean person, for the record. But that pissed me off.

[SeveneightyWhoa]

10. Um, he isn't significant at this point.

Please tell me, in practical, realistic terms, how Kucinich's poll results are at all significant in the overall scheme of things.

[BurtWorm]

12. According to you and CNN he isn't significant.

But he's one of the seven candidates. They can't make room for his numbers?

Ummm, my ass!

[krkaufman]

9. Agreed

Yes, agreed. (I've tried to mention that fact -- and Al -- in some of my past posts on the subject.)

[democratreformed]

14. I agree with you. n/t

[tishaLA]

15. You're right

But you're lucky to have Will Pitt on the campaign now. I'm sure he'll raise hell and consciousness.