Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems who voted to make English our "official" language

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:16 PM
Original message
Dems who voted to make English our "official" language
Lincoln - AR
Pryor - AR
Carper - DE
Nelson - FL
Landrieu - LA
Baucus - MT
Conrad - ND
Dorgan - ND
Nelson - NE
Johnson - SD
Byrd - WV

I wonder how many of them speak another language? So what happens to the "unofficial" languages spoken widely in many areas of the U.S., like Spanish, Yiddish, Mohawk, Cherokee, Navajo, Lakota et al?

Thank you to the above Dems for their wonderful commitment to multiculturalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remarkably close the the bunch that crossed over to vote for
Alito... see my sig line.

I just read in another thread that a vote for one of these moronic a-hole DINOS is a vote for Conyers or Kennedy. Conyers or Kennedy would be disgusted with this vote.... almost as much as I am.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Right, the so-called "moderate" Dems who joined the
so-called "Gang of 14". Happily Salazar (one of the Gangsters) remembered the ethnic roots of his last name this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. So THESE are the ones who keep gumming up the works??
You don't say!! It's NOT the corporate DLC sell-outs. Well I'll be danged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Both Lincoln and Pryor speak Arksawan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Arksawan?
I'm born and raised in Arkansas. I don't believe Arksawan is spoken here. For that matter, I don't even know what an Arksawan is. But, I will pass it on, I'm sure my kin will get a kick out of it. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Oops, I left out something....Arkansawan. Sorry. I still see the state
population referred to as Arkansawyers in the newspapers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. once the cuban americans get a whiff of nelson's of fla.vote he may just
be toast...and katherine harris may get his seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. AR and ND should be proud.
Edited on Fri May-19-06 03:24 PM by nickshepDEM
Especially ND, they have two of the finest senators in the country.

Ill be writing Mikulski and Sarbanes for not supporting this piece of legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't we want to have Democratic Senators in red states?
Or are we too purist for that?

Isn't it the job of Democrats to represent the wishes of the people in their own states? This means that there will be votes made by some Democratic Senators that Democrats in other states might not approve of. Without these occasional votes, soon we would have no Democratic Senators in red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What about representing the Sioux in North Dakota?
Edited on Fri May-19-06 03:40 PM by joemurphy
And since when did this become such a burning issue in the Red States?

And what good are Democrats that always vote with the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. They don't always vote with Republicans. Check out
www.progressivepunch.com

if you are interested in voting records. There's surprisingly little overlap between Republicans and Democrats these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. If a red state Dem Senator votes with the red state GOP...
Is he really a Dem? Is it better to have a "democrat in name only" than work to get a real Democrat elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. He's a Dem when it comes to deciding whether Dems or
Repubs are assigned to be chairs of ALL Senate Committees. At this point in time, that's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. that argument became null and void after IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Iraq War Resolution n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That argument is even more crucial since Bush has
pushed us into what he's now calling a new world war.

We have to get the Bush-traitors, and we can make a start by getting the Chairmanships of committees so we will finally have subpoena power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. So I'm making a "racist apologetist argument" by pointing out
that Senators don't get elected if they don't represent the people in their states? And that we need more Democrats in office in order to get Bush & Co. out?

Sorry, but I disagree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. I totally agree with you
It just gets discouraging that we have to pander to base instincts to keep Democrats in red states. They have to vote for every jingoistic, racist, homophobic, sexist piece of legislation that comes down the pike.

But, you're right. There's no other answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
45. It's also those democrats' jobs to be LEADERS
And not just do what polls well....

What he was saying about the Iraq War Resolution earlier, is that while it was incredibly popular at the time, now a majority of Americans wish that we hadn't gone into Iraq. Because congressmen are supposed to be able to make better decisions than the people, they should've not approved Bush's request to go to war. That way, their constituents would never have had wish that we hadn't gone into Iraq becuase we wouldn't have gone into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. You forgot Finnish.
Edited on Fri May-19-06 03:41 PM by longship
My grandparents all came from Northern Europe after the turn of the 20th century. My mother's primary language was Finnish, even though she was born in Wisconsin. The household language was Finnish. She learned English first from her older brothers. My grandfather knew English, but to my knowledge, my grandmother did not. She lived over three decades here in the US and never spoke a word of English.

In the northern regions of the midwest (Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota) there are still communities where Finnish is common and even native borns speak with a tinge of Finn accent.

The interesting thing about this is that these communities are held together not only by a common language, but by their cultural heritage.

That's a part of my life that I sorely miss since moving to Southern California. However, I find the Mexican culture here delightful. I just wish that there was a pasty store (or two) here.

Cultural heritages, and all their affectations (including language), enrichen this country. I am firmly against this ridiculous "English" bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're right about Finnish. Forgot about the upper Peninsula
of Michigan. Lots of French and Cornish descendants there too. And pasties are delicious! Had some in Hubble, Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaSea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Will lawmakers be deprived of Latin?
Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oy! Such a ting.
Am I out of line to imagine that an official religion might be something they'd suggest at some point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guidod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'M TIRED OF ALL THIS SHIT!!!!!
Let's see immigration, english, gay marriage? Next will be flag burning! Quit falling into the repugs (Rove) trap and stop talking about all of this crap. Who cares??? FOCUS! FOCUS! FOCUS!! Are we forgetting it's an election year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. All that could concieveably happen to those languages is
that they won't appear on ballots, your utility bills, street signs etc. It's not exactly like we're banning books in other languages or their use at home or in cultural associations etc.

French is the official language of France, but plenty of Frenchmen still speak other native languages (Basque, Breton, Picardie) or other immigrant languages (Arabic).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. Except that the Senate specifically
said unless the use of other languages is authorized or mandated by law.

And it doesn't cover private matters, such as contractual relations. It would do much less than people think it would.

And it's only in the Senate; it'll have to go through a conference committee or be voted on separately in the House to become law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Thanks - I know who to send Thank you letters to.
Thanks for posting that. I now know which Democratic Senators to send thank you letters to. It's about time some Democrats stood up for the American people and the American middle class, instead of catering to the Corporate Cheap Labor Lobby and their allies in the open border lobby.

Congratulations to all of those that did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
49. It's generally considered poor form to end an English sentence
with a preposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Or to overuse the passive.
"Preposition stranding" is a very nice English practice. Sometimes people confuse phrasal verbs with preposition stranding; fortunately, this isn't a case of that.

Too bad French and Latin don't have preposition stranding. They have obligatory pied-piping. But they're certainly not justification to continue to strait-jacket English.

I imagine that if English had been the model for French in the 1600s we'd still have quaint, but archaic, folk struggling to split French infinitives. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good for them!
11 true patriots standing up for the American people! Can't knock that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah, fly your flag you true American.
And someone whose native language is Spanish and doesn't speak English well isn't really an "official" American like you. That's a great thing. Really great.
Send them your congratulatory letter. All "true" Americans should be pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. all it takes is practice.
maybe they should try it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Can't argue your point, buff.
My main problem is this. I understand that when the Europeans, that many of us sprung from, came thru Ellis Island that they didn't speak English, and I also understand that many of, especially the older members from immigrant families, STILL don't speak a lick of english. Whether they are Italians or Polish or whatever, I doubt that anyone expected to find a country expected to speak to THEM in THEIR native tongue.

BUT.....I am involved in retail here in Texas, and the one thing that I see ALOT...and I mean ALOT....is latino immigrants that get mad at ME and my employees...why? BECAUSE WE DON'T SPEAK SPANISH!!! Now I didn't move to Mexico. But if I did, I wouldn't EXPECT that people waiting on me in restaurants or shoe stores would speak ENGLISH. That doesn't mean that some DON'T, just like their are bilingual service employees in Texas. And even though a "tourist" might think that Mexicans that WANT the American dollar SHOULD speak english, I don't believe that it is their responsiblity to do so. But when you are coming into another country to work and better yourself, and may have even done so illegally.....I can't see where you have any place getting mad at the locals for speaking the local language!! It is THEIR responsiblity to become part of the American experience by becoming part of the culture, which, I believe, requires learning the predominant language ot the adopted country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I do think that's a temporary problem
A recent survey found that only 7% of 2nd-generation Hispanic-Americans speak Spanish as their primary language. While the term "primary language" may be vague, it is true that the overwhelming majority of American-born-and-raised Hispanics speak English fluently. Language assimilation WILL happen. Bilinguilism was common in ALL immigrant communities for a few generations.

The attitude of some of your customers who expect that you should be able to speak Spanish probably comes from the fact that several businesses and institutions DO provide bilingual services, which probably makes them expect it as a given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. You could be right there too....
.....but they need to lower their expectations JUST a tad....lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. I think that English as our National language -
- may be a lot more important to businesses - especially small ones - than to individuals. Having English as our national language may help prevent future legislation requiring businesses to translate every memo, flyer, brochure, menu, etc. into several languages and the requirement of bi-lingual employees. The expense to double produce and translate everything is overwhelming and is passed on to the rest of the consumers. Sure, some businesses currently do that because they have a high number of immigrant clients but such services should be voluntary only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. It IS volutnary
it only becomes a requirement for Gov'ment agencies such as the DMV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. For the most part, it is voluntary -
- with some exceptions that will not be revoked by making English our national language according to what I've read.

That is why my post referred to FUTURE legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #27
47. What form of English should be our national language?
Should we all learn to speak like they do in Beowulf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is really a sick sick vote...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. What's the common demoninator here? Why, Dey'se all RED states
ok, so Delaware is kinda blue, and FLA is on the fence, but the rest are all red, red, red.

Which tells us that in red states, politicians have to pander to white people's fears in order to stay elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. Bill Nelson is beating his opponent by 30 points
He could vote straight party line this year and still beat Katherine Harris in double digits. He may be in a red state, but he's by no means in danger of losing his seat. And Delaware isnt' kinda blue, it's very blue. Carper was Governor for two terms and then became a senator. He has a very slim chance of losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. I thought several Republicans filed by the deadline?
Msybe I am mistaken, but I remember hearing LeRoy Collins, Jr. did...his dad was governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. They're all unknowns
Harris will probably win the primary and if she doesn't, none of them will do much better. Nelson is one of the safest incumbents in the US Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. See my post in GD about LeRoy Collins...dad was governor..a Democrat.
Actually he was one of the best governors the state ever had. He could take off, IMHO. Name recognition.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1247527
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. My sincerest and overwhelming THANKS to al these dems!
Great job - keep up the good work.

And I am NOT being sarcastic.

I just may send these dems a letter of support and a cash contribution.

Thanks for letting us know who's looking out for MY interests!

I'm sure you didn't mean to, tho!

HA! Jokes on YOU!

HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #35
48. "all" is spelled with 2 l's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
36. Speaking as an immigrant to the USA, I am glad to see
that Americans are waking up to the importance and unifying
force a single official language can be. I was born and raised
in a multi-lingual country, and have seen AT FIRST HAND the
dissention and divisiveness caused by not having a single
language for all official and commercial business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. Thanks for posting your personal experience, BigYawn.
As you can see, personal experience doesn't rate as high as ideology on DU lately.

I also happen to agree with you. The reason this is an issue now, and not in the past, is because the number of Spanish-only speakers is so large. Previous immigrants (or at least their children) HAD to learn English to function in this country. With such a large percentage of the population able to live their lives "in Spanish," there is a tremendous risk of having two separate societies eventually. With the natural diversity of the U.S., it's crucial that we all have a language in common. (And, no, I'm not interested in learning Spanish and shouldn't have to.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
38. These same people always screw things up!
Every time I see the list who vote with republican... it's always the same group of the people. They really need to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
41. I believe all of those
Edited on Sat May-20-06 06:00 AM by fujiyama
also voted for the bankruptcy bill.

Funny, the defense I usually see is "they are representing their constituents"...

Really? Is Landreiu or Byrd representing the poor of New Orleans or the miners of coal country while supporting these crappy pieces of legislation?

These senators are smart at voting for meaningless legislation that doesn't do anything for anybody. This "English only" campaign makes no sense whatsoever. What is the point of this? English is the de facto official language as it is...Everything is in English. Is this really a pressing concern? Certain areas that have a large population of non English speakers is problematic, but I'm sorry but that requires funding and English education. Funny, I don't see ANY senator mentioning federal funding for ESL classes.

The question is, how are these people really helping to better the lives of their constituents? They aren't. Jingoistic, feel good crap, may make them feel good, but it's all feelings. What a bunch of worthless fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. The bankruptcy bill was a horrible piece of legislation.
Edited on Sat May-20-06 05:42 AM by joemurphy
As was their unprincipled stand on the Alito nomination. Add this "English" is our official language abomination to their "Wall of Shame".

For me, the Democratic party stands for inclusivity, multiculturalism, and
tolerance of minor differences amidst a wider sharing of more important values. "English only" to me is just code-speak for the exact opposite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
44. Interesting NONE of them is fro the SW
Yes it matters... by the way if they get away with it, I wonder if our distinguished Senators realize there goes the bilateral border commisiion and many other bilateral groups that rely on the dusty old agreements of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC