Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Lieberman -or- Why we dodged a bullet in 2000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:14 AM
Original message
President Lieberman -or- Why we dodged a bullet in 2000
Edited on Wed May-17-06 12:35 AM by calmblueocean
I was looking at one of the "Who would've made a better president, Gore or Kerry?" threads, and I realized that if Gore had been president, and 9/11 had occurred, Gore would very likely have been impeached and removed from office by the Republican wingnut Congress. This would have left us with President Lieberman in charge, and based on Lieberman's love of warmongering as evidenced by his rabid support of Bush, we might be in the same place we are today... or even worse.

Gore chose Lieberman because he wanted to show he could be a bipartisan president. But his endorsement of Dean over Lieberman in the 2004 primaries is just one example that shows how much Gore has really found himself, and chosen to support his convictions over mere electibility. The Gore that may run in 2008 is the Gore this country truly needs, and we may never have known him if it weren't for the Bush debacle. In the end, it's possible all paths from 2000 led to a neocon future, and if so, then a Gore in 2008 is much better than a Gore in 2000.

Of course, it's also possible that Gore wouldn't have run the dumbass SDI-obsessed administration that Bush did, and would have prevented 9/11 from happening in the first place, as well as every single atrocity that came after it. But that future is almost too painful to imagine.


Edited for Constitutional clarity (thanks, Bucky!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gore doesn't have Bush's Middle East connections...
...so he could never have pulled off 9/11. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Senate doesn't impeach. The House impeaches.
The Senate vote to remove an impeached officer from office requires a 2/3 majority. If impeached, Gore would have stayed in office. And had such a tragedy occurred, Joementum would not have invaded Iraq. He's an enabler on his worst days, but he's not a neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You don't think the Rethugs would've demonized Gore out of office?
They sure as hell would've tried, and perhaps succeeded. That sort of thing is how the PATRIOT Act got passed in the first place. Scared Dems who thought they needed to sound tough in order to get re-elected. And I don't have anywhere near the faith in Smokin' Joe that you do. I take him at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. You're right, they probly would've tried. Tried and failed.
Dems stuck fast by Clinton and more Republicans than Democrats crossed the aisle in both houses of COngress. THey would have looked for an excuse, but I'm pretty sure the move would've been politically disasterous. They got burned bad on the Lewisnky imbroglio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. President Lieberman - still better than W!
It's quite an idiotic premise - and I am fully aware of who Joementum is. But to talk aboit "dodging a bullet in 2000" when we are in the present misery....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Except, I don't think 9/11 would even have happened under Gore.
Edited on Wed May-17-06 12:45 AM by IntravenousDemilo
I think it's quite possible the terrorist attacks were actually provoked by the accession of Bush to the presidency.

And if not, he certainly didn't do anything to prevent them when he could have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bingo!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hey, you're fast!
I edited my post and added a little bit inside after you responded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Good timing has not always been my strong suit. I just lucked out this
time. But I agreed so strongly with what you said, I had to respond immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Ditto n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Gore Would Have Been JFK'ed
9/11 wouldn't have happened (A REAL President would have prevented it).

They would have JFK'ed Gore and blamed it on "terrorists".

President Lieberman would happily wage war on any country that ever said "boo" to Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, while it's true that...
Well, while it's true that even in a royal screwing, there may be the occasional silver lining--and not having Senor Lieberman as a VP at the head of the party and subsequently wanting to be 'the' candidate for President, certainly counts as one. Still, by comparison to what we've lost for having been unable to occupy the White House, it's a pretty small silver lining. Rest assured Gore would not have done the tiniest fraction of the imbecilically America-destructive things Bush did (including the not wasting resources on SDI, allowing/not preventing 9/11, insane tax-cuts/deficits/debt, Afghanistan/Iraq quagmires, etc., etc., etc., ad-infinitum).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, it would have been horrible to have a pro-choice, pro-environment
pro-workers rights, liberal as President. You guys sure lucked out there (sarcasm).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC