Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Education law leaves children behind (AP/CNN) {all states will FAIL test}

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 02:27 PM
Original message
Education law leaves children behind (AP/CNN) {all states will FAIL test}
'The day of reckoning is here, and it's not going to pass'

Friday, May 12, 2006; Posted: 11:02 p.m. EDT (03:02 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Not a single state will have a highly qualified teacher in every core class this school year as promised by President Bush's education law. Nine states along with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico face penalties.

The Department of Education on Friday ordered every state to explain how it will have 100 percent of its core teachers qualified -- belatedly -- in the 2006-07 school year.

In the meantime, some states face the loss of federal aid because they didn't make enough effort to comply on time, officials said.

They are Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina and Washington, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
***
Although the federal term is "highly qualified," the definition is widely regarded as more of a minimum qualification, because it requires teachers to know what they teach.
***
more: http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/05/12/teacher.quality.ap/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Duh.
We teachers know the education law is bs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well what the hell do people expect anyway?
The term "highly qualified" is just so much BS. And schools, like senior citizens/Medicare, only have so many staff to devote to so many professional development issues. Time is a factor. Not to mention that fact that some positions require special circumstances for rural districts or for special education personnel.

America, wake up! Why aren't children performing well in our schools? Because too many of our kids are lazy, just plain flat out lazy with lazy parents who couldn't raise a turnip much less expend the energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was just at an education law seminar and learned that it is all BS
There is something called a "highly dangerous school" or some BS like that - gawd, I hate the way Congress makes up those terms - different school districts around the country either don't report, or lie, or twist the numbers. Honest districts will report their dangerous schools. But nothing happens. Dishonest districts won't report.

The numbers to determine if you are a dangerous school are 20 dangerous incidents, but if you have 1000 or 3000 students, 20 is the number of incidents.

So, Pennsylvania has hundreds of dangerous schools and the County of Los Angeles has none. :rofl:

I imagine that highly qualified teachers is another federal government phrase that is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC