Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can an indictment be sealed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:14 AM
Original message
Can an indictment be sealed?
Is it possible that Rove could already be indicted but it is under seal and only he and his lawyers know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. From Wiki...more
Edited on Sat May-13-06 11:17 AM by xultar
Sealed Indictment

An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But wouldn't he resign, regardless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Phuck Yeah. Our only saving grace in this nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. So we can still ridicule him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. which begs the question
Can an executive pardon be trumped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Can he executive pardon someone accused of treason? nq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Read the Constitution
Presidential pardon power is absolute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. True, but whether he would do it is another question...
entirely. I doubt that Bush would be able to do it without destroying completely what political power he has left, of which there is very little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Rove has got so much shit on Bush, Cheney and who knows all
If he threatens to sing, he'll get his pardon. Either that or he'll suffer a tragic accident on his way to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The problem is that if Rove is as smart as people think...
he would have thought of that. He probably has PLENTY of dirt on the Dirty Duo, so he probably considers himself safe, this is assuming he's not one of those ideologes that thinks Bush and Dick are God's own chosen, if he thinks that, then he would set himself up as a sacrificial lamb for those two. That's probably even worst than having Bush pardoning him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Rove never struck me as a mushy Bush-lover
He's no Condi.

I think he does what he does for the power, the thrill of being "a player," but even more so just because he can. It's a challenge and something he knows he's "good" at. Read in Franken's last book about some of the shit he pulled in Alabama.

Rove is kinda like those kids who invent computer viruses. They get a kick out of seeing how much damage they can do and how much they can get away with. Probably has something to do with not getting laid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ha!
You forget history, my friend.

That's some mighty fanciful thinking on your part, considering Fuckface hasn't shown the slightest inclination to give a rat's ass about anything since he seized office, and, with the law on his side - yes, for once, the law would be on his side in the matter of Presidential pardons - he can do whatever the hell he wants.

To think otherwise is to overlook his old man's history, for example. Let us never forget the infamous Christmas pardons, as well as the Ford pardon of an unindicted co-conspirator named Richard Nixon.

It is absolute. That takes it far beyond the realm of the political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. How long can an indictment be sealed? nq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Until the glue cracks?
Or until the clerk's tongue gets tired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Are you saying indefinitely? Interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, I'm saying
that you should ask a lawyer.

Call one, pay for his or her opinion, and then you'll know everything you want to know.

Or, you can go to law school.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely.
If Fitzgerald isn't stopping at Rove (and why would he) he may very well leave rove's indictment sitting there while he lets the next round of perps stew. My guess is that various lawyers for people other than Rove and Libby are making inquiries and overtures right now trying to find out their client's status and probing to find the parameters of the best deal that they can make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. is there any other reason the GJ could have been meeting yesterday
other than to indict? what else is there to do? maybe it's done but it just hasn't been announced yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They were all lickin the seal on the indictment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I have read that Grand Jury meets about other cases besides Plame leak
The 'Truthout' blog article states that Fitz did not even meet with the GJ yesterday, only with Rove's lawyers. To my knowledge no media reports have stated that Fitz has met with GJ since Rove's testimony there last month. This GJ, unlike the earlier GJ, has other cases they are considering.

I have my doubts that the GJ has actually voted to indict yet. Fitz may have just officially notified Rove's attorney that he is now a target on several charges and gave him the opportunity to work out a plea negotiation and provide more information. If Rove will not make a deal, Fitz will then recommend charges for GJ vote the next time they meet and final charges will be presented to a judge before an official announcement is made. I just hope that Rove has no more tricks up his sleeve and that Fitz has reached the end of his tolerance of Rove's delaying tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. He won't be frog-marched from the WH,
Edited on Sat May-13-06 01:52 PM by AtomicKitten
but resigning is pretty damn sweet. Bah-bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC