Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A hacker could use the software to rig or sabotage an election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:20 PM
Original message
A hacker could use the software to rig or sabotage an election
3 states mandate more security for Diebold e-voting machines

By DAN GOODIN
ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://famulus.msnbc.com/famulusgen/ap05-10-185638.asp?t=apnew&vts=51020061954

SAN FRANCISCO, May 10 — Officials overseeing elections in three states have directed local authorities to take additional security measures with a popular type of electronic voting machine to prevent election fraud.

California, Iowa and Pennsylvania issued the voting directives in recent weeks after researchers discovered a feature that could allow someone to load unauthorized software on Diebold Election Systems computerized machines.

A hacker theoretically could use the software to rig or sabotage an election or to perform some other unauthorized function, said Michael Shamos, a computer science professor at Carnegie Mellon University.

''It's worse than a hole,'' said Shamos, who has been briefed on the vulnerability of the Diebold machines. ''It's a deliberate feature that was added by Diebold that we all believe is unwise.''

In the wake of the ballot-tabulating problems that plagued the 2000 presidential election, electronic voting has become a flash point for many people concerned about fair elections. Critics charge that electronic voting machines are too susceptible to fraud and error to be trusted and should not replace traditional balloting until proper safeguards are installed.

Diebold spokesman David Bear said there is no evidence electronic results have been subject to tampering. He added it would be hard for anyone to exploit the recently discovered flaw if officials follow security procedures already in place, but that Diebold is developing a permanent solution to address concerns.

The additional safeguard spelled out in the directives ''is one more redundancy to ensure the security of the election,'' Bear said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Both sides should actually be concerned about this.
Ask any good hacker, in every program there is a crack that let's the light come in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We'll be using them in Pa...
for the first time and it concerns me. you know, 'cause of Sanitorium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Guy Donating Member (875 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I actually hope it will happen
If there is some way a progressive/liberal could hack into those machins and manipulate the numbers to help our side, I'm all for it. Give the freepers a taste of their own medicine for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Most likely it'll be the other way around n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC