Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We don't have protests, we have parades.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:11 PM
Original message
We don't have protests, we have parades.
Something said to me by a friend on another board today.

He was making the point that we have permits, are restricted to certain streets, we carry signs and that's more of a parade than a protest. There are few and far between acts of peaceful civil disobedience.

I was just wondering what you guys thought of this. Are we having useless parades? Is there a better way?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I personally have been wondering that for a while now...
I swear if I didn't have a job I'd go down to the federal building right now and handcuff myself to the front door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tell that to the SWAT teams...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. throwing lettuce at the motorcade was more of a protest.
than what we've had lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GymGeekAus Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What's the alternative?
I agree, Kynd. Our protest culture is shackled by ridiculous laws. It does turn any gathering by like-minded individuals who desire to express their opinions into something of a parade.

But these parades do have value. Just like GLBT parades.

I don't know what all the rules are, personally. I recognize the value of the government knowing when and where these events occur, since there is often a need to protect and police such events. Also, it gives the government an opportunity to know where to hear dissent, which would be valuable if the government paid any attention. Establishing "free-speech" zones is a dangerous precedent, in that it creates this idea that we're not entitled to speak truth to power in other places.

I think we are being tasked with a seriously complicated problem as modern progressives: How to get the attention of the media and the government without making demands upon local police forces. The blogosphere is a good option, except that it's so easy to ignore. Petitions don't attract the attention of the media, and we're pretty sure that they just land in the trashcan anyway. Boycotts don't do anything unless people are aware of them, and again we lack a friendly media.

I'm not a professional protester or organizer, I'm just a guy with a political opinion who sometimes joins in. I don't think I'm gonna solve this.

By the way, HOWDY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree.. and hey stranger!
I'm not sure what the alternative is, and I know they are important. I'm just brainstorming what could be done.

I think marching without a permit is a start toward civil disobedience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think "parades" do just as much good, if not more...
than peaceful civil disobedience. I've been in protest marches -- or parades, if you prefer -- and I've also been hauled off to jail. Both actions get about the same amount of media coverage. But only one of them leaves you standing on the street corner to continue protesting.

Now, if civil disobedience got more media coverage, or could result in serious, meaningful change not achieved by protest marches, I might see your point. But as it is... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree with you Razor.
I didn't say this initially. It just made me think a bit.

The media sucks no matter what we do. There is no coverage. I don't know what the solution is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC