Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would 200 million$ * even be silly enough to debate special interests?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:49 PM
Original message
Would 200 million$ * even be silly enough to debate special interests?
This entire issue is a non-issue. Campaigns cost money. That is the reality. No money = no campaign. I am as dismayed as anyone by the amount of corporate cash in campaigns but making a law that does NOT shoot the opposition party in the foot while competing wit richer Republicans is a tough task.

Even John McCain who co authored the bill acknowledged such.

ANYONE who believes George Bush can somehow take ANY of our candidates down over campaign contributions after the money flowing from healthcare, pharma, banks and defense industries to his campaign needs to PLEASE spell it out for me.

I think we are shooting ourselves in the foot over and over with this one.

None of the major candidates can claim they have taken NO corporate cash. None of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. You've got it backwards
The question is not what Bush will attack us with, but rather on what issues will we have the moral high ground. Bush can and should be taken to task for:

- Special interest ties
- Iraq war
- Patriot Act
- NCLB
- Budget/Tax cuts/deficit

Our canididates are not all equal on their ability to take on Bush on these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'll take the guy who can remind voters that legislation that was
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 05:56 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
more beneficial to them WAS offered up and blocked by the Republican congress who passed a more harmful bill.

I'll take the guy who can inform people how the bankruptcy bill hurts average Americans.

I'll take the guy who can explain how LESS jobs would be lost due to NAFTA and trade if KYOTO had not been dropped and other countries had to comply with somthing similar to our clean air laws.

I'll take the guy who KNOWS the legislative history point by point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. THANK YOU!!! Did you know environmentalists are a special interest?
did you know Teacher's Unions are special interests? Did you know Healthcare reform advocacy groups are special interests? We are all tied to various lobbying groups and special interests. The word gets abused a lot. I think Kerry is correct in saying he can demonstrate a record of not allowing money from this or that person making a negative impact on his voting and his representation of the people.

I WANT him to listen to special interest groups like Planned Parenthood and GLAAD. Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, all of them are special interests
And the Republican Owned Media (ROM, the new meme I just thought up) will claim that Halliburton, GE, AFA, Christian Coalition et. al. (etc ad nausuem) are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush doesn't have to say a peep about it
The handmaiden press can do it for him. Democrats had still better be ready to fight hard on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I totally agree with you
Kerry isn't even in Bush's galaxy when it comes to Special Interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's writing legislation for them
That's the thing, that's what this Administration does time and time and time again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Completely agree
The energy industry is literally writing the legislation for this admin. Case in point, Cheney's secret energy task force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. what would be interesting is the BALANCE of special interest
money. I'm sure there are a lot of cases of a candidate getting money from competing interests. Like....Union money and trade groups. probably not as much in the abortion/gay/gun control arenas but perhaps from environmental groups and energy groups.

The candidate is pretty much covered because in those cases, the money got him/her in and gives those people a voice on the policy discussion but not necessarily his guaranteed vote. If, however, the bulk of money for a candidate comes completely from the business and ownership interests....and then the policies flowing from administration fall in line with those industries wishes...we can connect the dots.

I wish there was less concentrated money in politics. If the power vaulting Kerry to the White House is grass roots campaigning and fundraising, you can guarantee he will keep faith with those groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC