|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ringmastery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:02 PM Original message |
Shocking exit poll: Edwards leading in OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monument (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abburdlen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
54. Wow is right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. unreliable source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ruh-roh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
isbister (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. We might just have found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDaddyLove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Or a future running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I like that better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cjbuchanan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. If these are true and hold up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ringmastery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Edwards is very strong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katieforeman (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shawmut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. the exits he had on his site for the NH primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. But it did have the correct order the candidates finished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shawmut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. i'd just say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windansea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. survey usa sez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katieforeman (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can Clark Survive This? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King of New Orleans (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I'm beginning to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grisvador (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Clark Supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. "Yes," Clark can survive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. If that's true, Clark's cooked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windansea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. large numbers of absentee votes in AZ NM & OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. That's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grisvador (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Cooked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. I'll fight for Clark to the end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. That would be sweet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. P-R-E-M-A-T-U-R-E Much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Early polls in NH showed Clark 5th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King of New Orleans (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. The exit poll was right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. This isn't a sampling with a MOE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. These numbers are within Zogby's MOE for OK final numbers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbieinok (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. OK POLLS CLOSE AT 7 CST - 7 CST - 7 CST - 7 CST -7 CST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PA-DEM (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
68. Same exit polls had Kerry-Dean within 3 pts in NH (Kerry wins by 13) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
22. I think Dean would be very happy to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MAlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Nice spin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
24. What to watch for on Election Day - from the Clark blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. REMEMBER..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MAlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. Not too late for more Calls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
37. There's nothing shocking about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abburdlen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
38. Now I am scared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Read this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleDannySlowhorse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
40. Marvelous! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. He and Clark are my 2nd choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
42. i've seen others that show him in 3rd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
44. RWingnut Drudge is doing this to sandbag Clark. Isn't it obvious! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. What I have seen is that it completely depends on whether or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. painfully obvious and quite sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Because it supports THEIR candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. PUKE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
48. Oh boy! Drudge quoting the National Review! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
53. So, let me get this straight, Edwards is in the lead and Drudge is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. This is going to be a long night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
56. Why should that be shocking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. This is just sour grapes from Clark supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. I'd like to see Edwards win several of these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Thanks for the clarification. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abburdlen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Not sour grapes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. These numbers don't "come" from Matt Druge and NRO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dumpster_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. yeah, you are pretty much right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Because Clark was leading in every poll, and Edwards was 3rd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
58. YOO HOOO RW to Sandbag the Dem primaries! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. there is no doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
67. How is this shocking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalBushFan (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
69. Kicking for certain people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SangamonTaylor (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 12:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. they look accurrate to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC