Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Slips--Even Further (Real NH Republican Primary Results)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:39 AM
Original message
Bush Slips--Even Further (Real NH Republican Primary Results)
Bush Slips--Even Further
02/02/2004 @ 5:38pm


Moments after the polls closed in New Hampshire on January 27, Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie declared that President Bush had won 94 percent of the Republican primary vote. It was a dramatic claim. Unfortunately for Gillespie, it was dramatically inaccurate.

<snip>

As it turns out, however, the unofficial tally by Associated Press significantly underestimated the collapse in the president's fortunes. According to updated figures from the New Hampshire Secretary of State's office, which only today posted a final figure on the total number of ballots cast, only 78 percent of New Hampshire voters who took Republican ballots marked them for Bush. (In one New Hampshire town, Milton, Bush received only 48 percent of the vote, while in a number of others he was held below 60 percent of the vote.)

<snip>

Considering President Bush's less-than-stellar showing in New Hampshire, it should come as little surprise that Republicans in some states have decided to cancel their primaries. In South Carolina, for instance, the state Republican Party's executive committee decided not to hold their state's tradition first-in- the-south primary. They simply endorsed Bush for reelection and agreed to select delegates at district and state Republican Party conventions where, presumably, the president will not have to run the risk of embarrassment at the hands of independent thinking voters.


more...

http://www.thenation.com/thebeat/index.mhtml?bid=1&pid=1228
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. 68%
Wow, that SUCKS......


for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. And of course the "liberal press" just goes along with the bogus figures
We have not heard a PEEP from from the big press about this surprising turn of events, of course....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush wins NH GOP primary 78 to 22 over nobody - nah doesn't fit media
story line.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. and Kerry got 4.3%!!!
The Democrat who won the most Republican primary votes was Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, who got 3,009 write-in votes, for 4.3 percent of the Republican primary total. Former New Hampshire Governor Howard Dean received 1,888 write-in votes for 2.7 percent. Retired General Wesley Clark got 1,467 Republican write-ins for 2.1 percent.

By contrast, Bush received only 257 write-in votes in the Democratic primary, where a total of 220,053 ballots were cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like Bush is finished
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not a good sign.
An active party support would translate into a high percentage of votes. Soft party support is a good thing for us. I think it's firmer outside of the west and northeast though. The south is his main base, where its' reversed and the Democratic primary voters are soft and the Republicans are more solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bush's anemic showing
Is especially interesting when being contrasted to Reagan's in 1984. Back then, Reagan got 5,000 votes in the Democratic primary (out of 100,000 votes). Shows how pathetically narrow Bush's appeal is (250 votes out of 220,000).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Democrats should definitely look to win NH
I think it's aberrant that Gore lost NH in 2000. NH's traditional Republicanism is indeed dying out, supplanted by emergent New England progressivism. It's a different state than in 1984.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC