Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Screaming Lawyers: "Vaginal and Anal Penetration" ... but semen is

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 05:55 PM
Original message
Screaming Lawyers: "Vaginal and Anal Penetration" ... but semen is
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 05:56 PM by Husb2Sparkly
..... 'DNA".

All day, all the screaming lawyers have been saying - shouting, actually - is "Vaginal and Anal Penetration" .... but when it comes to ... well .... cum ..... its 'DNA". Is semen no longer an operative term, but the technical names for the genitalia of possibly raped college student is okay to use?

I dunno .... maybe I'm over-reacting here, but this kind of crap just grates on me.

And to show I'm not imagining it, one of the screaming lawyers started to use the word 'semen' and literally stopped in mid 'sem' ..... and used DNA. Clearly this is an order from on high.

Who the hell is scripting all this crap?????

This is kinda like evolution vs creationism ...... but in reverse. In this case, there is **clearly** a higher power.

edit to fix title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I see your frustration but
could using the broader term of DNA be meant to include saliva, blood, hair, and skin?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. So whose semen is it?
Is this about the lacrosse team? I guess they're doing more tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I see your point, but maybe it's a legal term, to remind everyone
that DNA is absolute proof of the identity of the attacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. "you can't dust for..." semen
completely inappropriate reference.

apologies.

i'm actually disgusted with how some DU'ers immediately screamed Twana Brawley yesterday on the DNA update. i thought we were better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Funny, I never saw anyone say that.
I did, however, see a lot of people advocating the immediate conviction of the entire sports team prior to the tests coming in, opposed by a vocal minority who favor investigation and the presumption of innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The "Twana Brawley" schtick was out in full blast here yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. this means???? you think she lied + the team are all innocent??? or what??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Google the story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, I never saw it either ... and I was kinda lurking here all thru the
day ...... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. the worst was in LBN, right when the news hit
i decided not peek at any more after that. glad it wasn't so bad here!

heard the story on ATC tonite. it was a good piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about..."Penile invasion"?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. So many inappropriate Airplane jokes...so little time...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I say RE-TEST DNA of team IN FRONT of an unbiased witness!
SOMETHING DOESN'T SMELL RIGHT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. You don't perfer the cleaned up version?
DNA versus... spooge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Some people call me Stinky the Clown ... but those who know me well
... call me gutter mouth.

Frankly, I've never understood the fear of words. Words have meaning and sonme words covey a shade of difference as compared to a seeming synonym.

Gerorge Carlin is a whiz at knowing what words and phrases work to convey to desired message. He'd never use 'DNA" unless it served a purpose ... and knowing him, that purpose would never be sanitization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Carlin...damn he's good
Say Semen 100 times & it loses all it's stickiness :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. one time I had to say...
..."cock-ring" in a speech I was giving. For days, I walked around my house saying "cock-ring" over and over so I would not blush when I said it in front of a group of people. It did not loose it's "stickiness." In fact as I write this, I still blush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. DNA means a lot more than semen. It's hair, it's skin, it's saliva.
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 09:33 PM by Neil Lisst
It's not just about semen, it's the fact that NO DNA was found.

And why do you call them "screaming lawyers?"

I've heard a lot of people on the news talking about it, lawyers and talking heads, and I didn't hear any of them screaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. In the specific context of today's 'discussions' they were talking about
splooge. Period.

When they *did* get off the cum talk, they mentioned hair and such specifically. But when they clearly meant cum - er, semen - it was 'DNA'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. actually, in the specific context of the incident
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 11:05 PM by Neil Lisst
it's not just semen, it's the hair and skin

They might have worn condoms, but not transferring any skin or hair to her in 30 minutes of fighting and raping is very unlikely, and therefore makes her story difficult to make fit the facts.

The complete absence of DNA on her, not just the absence of semen, is what just about kills the case, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC