Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitz: "It is hard to disprove White House efforts to 'punish' Wilson"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:24 AM
Original message
Fitz: "It is hard to disprove White House efforts to 'punish' Wilson"
April 11, 2006
White House Memo
With One Filing, Prosecutor Puts Bush in Spotlight
By DAVID E. SANGER and DAVID JOHNSTON

WASHINGTON, April 10 — From the early days of the C.I.A. leak investigation in 2003, the Bush White House has insisted there was no effort to discredit Joseph C. Wilson IV, the man who emerged as the most damaging critic of the administration's case that Saddam Hussein was seeking to build nuclear weapons.

But now White House officials, and specifically President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, have been pitched back into the center of the nearly three-year controversy, this time because of a prosecutor's court filing in the case that asserts there was "a strong desire by many, including multiple people in the White House," to undermine Mr. Wilson.

The new assertions by the special prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, have put administration officials on the spot in a way they have not been for months, as attention in the leak case seems to be shifting away from the White House to the pretrial procedural skirmishing in the perjury and obstruction charges against Mr. Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr.

Mr. Fitzgerald's filing talks not of an effort to level with Americans but of "a plan to discredit, punish or seek revenge against Mr. Wilson." It concludes, "It is hard to conceive of what evidence there could be that would disprove the existence of White House efforts to 'punish Wilson.' " With more filings expected from Mr. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor's work has the potential to keep the focus on Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney at a time when the president is struggling with his lowest approval ratings since he took office.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/11/washington/11leak.html?ei=5065&en=bfc9f24ecf86e6b3&ex=1145419200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clearly, this was Abuse of Power. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Fitz!
Of all the scandals threatening this admin, I think the Plame leak has the most potential to topple the regime. Fitz is the right man to be pursuing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tomorrow's Filings Should Help
"With more filings expected from Mr. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor's work has the potential to keep the focus on Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney at a time when the president is struggling with his lowest approval ratings since he took office"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. If Mr Bush "de-classified" the information.....?
then would that not clear Dick Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jan 2004 David Kay :The statement, "We were almost all wrong,"
Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing

Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Posted: 7:29 PM EST (0029 GMT)

Former top U.S. weapons inspector David Kay addresses the Senate Armed Services Committee.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/01/28/kay.transcript/

They all say 'they believed' there were WMDs, therefor they existed. Pretzel logic when you see that others in the intelligence community adamantly disbelieved there were WMDs present. And if you did express doubts you were punished.

David Kay, BTW, had his personal data stolen from SAIC where he worked after his ISG work was done:

""David Kay, who was chief weapons inspector in Iraq after nearly a decade as an executive at SAIC, said he has devoted more than a dozen hours to shutting down accounts and safeguarding his finances. He said the successful theft of personal data, by thieves who smashed windows to gain access, does not speak well of a company that is devoted to keeping the government's secrets secure.""

Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft
Computers Held Personal Data on Employee-Owners
by Griff Witte
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 12, 2005; Page E01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17506-2005Feb11.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC