Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald to reveal more "clues"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:17 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald to reveal more "clues"...
The answer to the question of whose recounting of events is correct — Mr. Bush's or Mr. Fitzgerald's — may not be known for months or years, if ever. But it seems there will be more clues, including some about the conversations between Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney.

Mr. Fitzgerald said he was preparing to turn over to Mr. Libby 1,400 pages of handwritten notes — some presumably in Mr. Libby's own hand — that could shed light on two very different efforts at getting out the White House story.

One effort — the July 18 declassification of the major conclusions of the intelligence estimate — was taking place in public, while another, Mr. Fitzgerald argues, was happening in secret, with only Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Libby involved.

<snip>

Mr. Fitzgerald suggested that the White House effort was a "plan" to undermine Mr. Wilson.

"Disclosing the belief that Mr. Wilson's wife sent him on the Niger trip was one way for defendant to contradict the assertion that the vice president had done so, while at the same time undercutting Mr. Wilson's credibility if Mr. Wilson were perceived to have received the assignment on account of nepotism," Mr. Fitzgerald's filing said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/11/washington/11leak.html?hp&ex=1144814400&en=ac4fcddd3dd28b1e&ei=5094&partner=homepage

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow
Anyone else get the feeling things are about to explode any day now? I think Shrub is getting a lot closer to the toaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have the same feeling, u2spirit. There's a whole lotta shakin'
goin' on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm with you guys/ I also think
that is why Bush will try and nuke Iran very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. hmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sexism as a defense?
BushCo. was not using 'nepotism' as a defense.

They were using sexism to portray Wilson as a girly-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think that's really interesting point, Gumby. I think they were
pretty lucky that Joe Wilson didn't come over there and sock them one in the kisser.

The guy was steamed, and I don't blame 'im.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I also think there is a certain amount of jealousy about Wilson/Plame
I mean, Joe Wilson is this handsome, dashing, well-spoken, jet-setting diplomat.

Contrast that with George, a drunken fratboy who can't string 5 words together without pausing to mentally congratulate himself, and who is about as dashing as a sack of roofing nails.

And Valerie Plame is this attractive CIA secret agent *swoon* who is jetting around doing clandestine work for the USA!

Contrast that with Laura, a frumpy, failed librarian, with what looks like a scorching Xanax problem.

Jealousy? I think there might be just a *little* bit at work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's already released something that debunks the whole declassified
spin (IMHO at least)

Check out the use of the phrase "then-classified" in his March 17th statement

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2563835&mesg_id=2563835
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC