Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fritz: Bush "was unaware of the role" that Libby? played in outing Plame.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:22 PM
Original message
Fritz: Bush "was unaware of the role" that Libby? played in outing Plame.


http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0407/dailyUpdate.html
posted April 7, 2006 at 12:54 p.m.

Did Bush misuse presidential powers?
Experts: Leaks are probably legal but 'amount to using sensitive intelligence data for political gain.'

By Tom Regan | csmonitor.com

The news that President Bush authorized the disclosure of classified information to certain reporters has set off a debate on whether or not Mr. Bush misused his national security powers. FoxNews reports that papers filed Thursday by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald disclose that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the only person indicted so far in the investigation into who 'outed' CIA agent Valerie Plame, told a grand jury that Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had authorized him to discuss with reporters the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) regarding Iraqi weapons systems.

Nothing in the papers indicate Bush or Cheney told Libby to reveal the name of CIA analyst Valerie Plame, nor do they suggest that either the president or vice president did anything illegal. But the documents do hint at more problems for the administration since some may show a plan to punish one of its critics, Plame's husband, Amb. Joe Wilson.

The Associated Press reports that the picture painted by the court papers is of a hesitant Mr. Libby, who had "qualms about leaking classified information to the press, but was quickly persuaded to drop them" after coming under pressure from Mr. Cheney, "who advised him that the president had authorized Libby to do so."


In his court filing, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald asserted that "the president was unaware of the role" that Libby "had in fact played in disclosing" Plame's CIA status. The prosecutor gave no such assurance, though, regarding Cheney.

......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. but Friz does not let Cheney off the hook.


In his court filing, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald asserted that "the president was unaware of the role" that Libby "had in fact played in disclosing" Plame's CIA status. The prosecutor gave no such assurance, though, regarding Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. there are a lot of juicy nuggets in this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. going to bookmark for reading
thanks for posting :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9.  LAT:" he is either a leaker or a hypocrite."--referring to Bush


....The Los Angeles Times writes in an editorial that the president now faces "an uncomfortable choice: he is either a leaker or a hypocrite."

There also is the issue of Bush's numerous previous statements, now making their way across the Internet at the speed of a DSL line, about leaking. One of the most popular is from Sept. 30, 2003: "Let me just say something about leaks in Washington. There are too many leaks of classified information in Washington. There's leaks at the executive branch; there's leaks in the legislative branch. There's just too many leaks. And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of."

Leave the legal issues about classified information and executive power to the constitutional scholars. The simpler question is whether Bush still believes, if he ever did, what he said in September 2003. If so, who in his administration needs to be taken care of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't care. If he goes after Cheney...
Which, it appears he might, the walls come tumbling down. Cheney is the dark force fueling this whole evil enterprise.

To paraphrase: "If you can get Cheney... that would be beautiful." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. maybe this answers the Question: Who is the real President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Meaning what? That George's ignorance relieves him of any guilt?
Play dumb, george..Your stupidity will be your salvation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It was news to me when I read it. I don't know what it means-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
infogirl Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. but it all leads back to
Valerie Plame....it is about what happened as a consequence, of Bush "releasing" the now unclassified material. A man, Joe Wilson wrote to the American people, the leak was filled with false information. Then, BAM, an unforgivable crime has taken place...one of our best was outed. This was always the issue...and Bu*h has wasted the country's time...playing these games...and if he gets away with this...it wasn't himi..blah, blah, blah...at the 100% of the people will know, he doesn't even care....for all that he already knows....

He is finished.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. yes, and I think it is Waas who says Bush knew the infor. was false
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. bush knew about 9-11 and he knew about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. well, seems that Friz believes Bush (recall he had that interview with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. and bush wouldn't lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. te he. Yet, Fritz's comment seems pretty clear cut


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bee Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. so he's just oblivious to whats going on in his admin?
thats just as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Fritz only addressed the role Lib. played, not the fact that Bush
did reslease the information (whch according to Wass was not Declassifed at the time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. That is an important distinction
I just posted a thread, which also cites this same article, explaining why it is false to say that Bush authorized the leaking of Plame's identity:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2557919

A lot of people seem to know this, but I still see many here on DU and elsewhere saying that Libby's statement means Bush is complicit in the leaking of Plame's identity. This is wrong, and to continue to parrot the line only hurts our credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Excellent coverage.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Circling and squeezing, the Fitz way...going slowly up the ladder
Libby's gotta feel like he's being left to twist, slowly, in the wind....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. This administration is sure doing a lot of sneaking around
and fooling absolutely no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. but it's fun to watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. "And if the person has violated law,
the person will be taken care of."

Yes, we see how Libby is being "taken care of". Millions of $s being raised by RWingers for his Defense and Obstruction at every turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC